Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP-E Topic 5 Question 80 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 80
Topic #: 5
[All CIPP-E Questions]

SCENARIO

Please use the following to answer the next question:

Building Block Inc. is a multinational company, headquartered in Chicago with offices throughout the United States, Asia, and Europe (including Germany, Italy, France and Portugal). Last year the company was the victim of a phishing attack that resulted in a significant data breach. The executive board, in coordination with the general manager, their Privacy Office and the Information Security team, resolved to adopt additional security measures. These included training awareness programs, a cybersecurity audit, and use of a new software tool called SecurityScan, which scans employees' computers to see if they have software that is no longer being supported by a vendor and therefore not getting security updates. However, this software also provides other features, including the monitoring of employees' computers.

Since these measures would potentially impact employees, Building Block's Privacy Office decided to issue a general notice to all employees indicating that the company will implement a series of initiatives to enhance information security and prevent future data breaches.

After the implementation of these measures, server performance decreased. The general manager instructed the Security team on how to use SecurityScan to monitor employees' computers activity and their location. During these activities, the Information Security team discovered that one employee from Italy was daily connecting to a video library of movies, and another one from Germany worked remotely without authorization. The Security team reported these incidents to the Privacy Office and the general manager. In their report, the team concluded that the employee from Italy was the reason why the server performance decreased.

Due to the seriousness of these infringements, the company decided to apply disciplinary measures to both employees, since the security and privacy policy of the company prohibited employees from installing software on the company's computers, and from working remotely without authorization.

In addition to notifying employees about the purpose of the monitoring, the potential uses of their data and their privacy rights, what information should Building Block have provided them before implementing the security measures?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ruby
1 months ago
The company should have provided clear information about the monitoring, its scope, and employees' rights. Failing to do so is a violation of privacy and could undermine morale and trust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
1 months ago
Haha, yeah, the employee from Germany must have been pretty confident to work remotely without authorization. Maybe he was just trying to get some sun while the rest of us freeze in the office.
upvoted 0 times
Alberto
5 days ago
He probably didn't realize the security team would catch him.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
9 days ago
I wonder if he thought he could get away with it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leana
12 days ago
I know right, that's pretty bold of him to work remotely without permission.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashonda
1 months ago
If I was the employee from Italy, I'd be furious! Monitoring computer activity without clear notice is a massive breach of trust. No wonder server performance took a hit - the employees were too busy hiding their movie marathons.
upvoted 0 times
Tamie
7 days ago
It's important for employees to know who to contact with any queries regarding the security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
9 days ago
I think the company should have provided information about how providing consent could affect employees as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Davida
16 days ago
I agree, it's definitely a breach of trust. Employees should have been informed about the monitoring before it was implemented.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cristina
2 months ago
I agree, the company should have been more transparent and given employees a chance to provide informed consent. Hiding the details behind vague 'security' measures is shady.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
1 months ago
C) Information about how providing consent could affect them as employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Velda
1 months ago
B) Information about who employees should contact with any queries.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emile
2 months ago
A) Information about what is specified in the employment contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bea
2 months ago
The company should have provided more detailed information about the monitoring and its impact on employees' privacy before implementing the security measures. Employees have a right to know how their data will be used and what their options are.
upvoted 0 times
Hollis
26 days ago
The company should have explained how the measures are in the best interests of the company to the employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Weldon
1 months ago
It's important for employees to know who to contact with any queries regarding the security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenn
2 months ago
They should have also been given information about what is specified in the employment contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edgar
2 months ago
Employees should have been informed about how providing consent could affect them as employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zita
2 months ago
I believe they should have also informed employees about how providing consent could affect them as employees.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luisa
2 months ago
I agree with you, Louis. Employees need to know what they are agreeing to when they sign the contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Louis
2 months ago
I think the company should have provided information about what is specified in the employment contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annalee
2 months ago
I also believe that employees should have been informed about how providing consent could affect them as employees. It's important for transparency and trust.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
3 months ago
I agree with you, Cherrie. Employees need to know what they are agreeing to and what is expected of them according to their contract.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
3 months ago
I think the company should have provided information about what is specified in the employment contract before implementing the security measures.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77