Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPP-E Topic 4 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPP-E exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 4
[All CIPP-E Questions]

Which failing of Privacy Shield, cited by the CJEU as a reason for its invalidation, is the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework intended to address?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

According to the GDPR, the material scope of the regulation covers the processing of personal data wholly or partly by automated means, or by non-automated means if the data forms part of a filing system or is intended to form part of a filing system (Article 2(1)). Personal data is defined as any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person (data subject) (Article 4(1)). An identifiable natural person is one who can be identified, directly or indirectly, by reference to an identifier such as a name, an identification number, location data, an online identifier or to one or more factors specific to the physical, physiological, genetic, mental, economic, cultural or social identity of that natural person (Article 4(1)). Therefore, pseudonymous data, such as blockchain transactions that use public keys or other identifiers, may still fall within the definition of personal data if the data subject can be identified or re-identified by using additional information or means (Recital 26).

The GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data in the context of the activities of an establishment of a controller or a processor in the European Union, regardless of whether the processing takes place in the European Union or not (Article 3(1)). The GDPR also applies to the processing of personal data of data subjects who are in the European Union by a controller or processor not established in the European Union, where the processing activities are related to the offering of goods or services to such data subjects in the European Union or the monitoring of their behaviour as far as their behaviour takes place within the European Union (Article 3(2)). Therefore, the territorial scope of the GDPR covers both controllers and processors established in the European Union, and controllers and processors not established in the European Union but targeting or monitoring data subjects in the European Union.

In this scenario, blockchain transactions are classified as pseudonymous data, which may still be considered as personal data under the GDPR if the data subjects can be identified or re-identified. Therefore, such transactions are within the material scope of the GDPR, as they involve the processing of personal data by automated means. However, the GDPR only applies to such transactions to the extent that they include data subjects in the European Union, either by having a controller or processor established in the European Union, or by offering goods or services to or monitoring the behaviour of such data subjects. Therefore, the answer is C.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Evette
1 months ago
I'm just hoping the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework can clean up this mess. Otherwise, we're all going to need a law degree to transfer data across the pond.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
1 months ago
Just when you thought data privacy couldn't get any more complicated, the CJEU throws us a curveball with Privacy Shield. Gotta love these legal puzzles!
upvoted 0 times
Nida
3 days ago
C) Necessity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
11 days ago
B) Right of Action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
17 days ago
A) Data Subject Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mila
1 months ago
Hold up, I've got a wild card here - what if the answer is actually A) Data Subject Rights? That's the one that really caught my eye in the question.
upvoted 0 times
Joni
23 hours ago
Yeah, that does seem like a key issue that needs to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
6 days ago
I think you might be onto something with A) Data Subject Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gene
2 months ago
Oh boy, this is a tricky one. I'm going to have to go with D) Consent. The CJEU seemed to have issues with the way consent was handled under Privacy Shield.
upvoted 0 times
Ezekiel
6 days ago
User 3: I believe it's D) Consent.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ilona
7 days ago
User 2: I'm going with B) Right of Action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
28 days ago
User 1: I think it's A) Data Subject Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Virgilio
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. I was thinking it might be C) Necessity, since the CJEU also had concerns about the broad nature of the surveillance programs under Privacy Shield.
upvoted 0 times
Kayleigh
15 days ago
Data Subject Rights are also important to address in a new framework.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deja
1 months ago
I agree, the broad surveillance programs were a major concern for the CJEU.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
1 months ago
I think you might be right. Necessity could definitely be a key issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merissa
2 months ago
I think the answer is definitely B) Right of Action. The CJEU cited the lack of an effective judicial remedy as a major failing of Privacy Shield.
upvoted 0 times
Harrison
1 months ago
Consent is also crucial, but having a right to take legal action is a key aspect of data protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frederick
1 months ago
It's important for data subjects to have a way to seek legal recourse in case of privacy violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
2 months ago
That's right, the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework aims to address the Right of Action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
2 months ago
I agree, the lack of an effective judicial remedy was a major issue with Privacy Shield.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shawnda
2 months ago
I think it could also be Necessity, as ensuring the necessity of data transfers is crucial for privacy protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
3 months ago
I agree with Jacob. Data Subject Rights were cited by the CJEU as a reason for invalidating Privacy Shield.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacob
3 months ago
I think the failing of Privacy Shield that the Trans-Atlantic Data Privacy Framework is intended to address is Data Subject Rights.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77