Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IAPP Exam CIPM Topic 2 Question 75 Discussion

Actual exam question for IAPP's CIPM exam
Question #: 75
Topic #: 2
[All CIPM Questions]

The first step an organization should take when considering the use of a third-party's AI-based resume ranking tool is to?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Under the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), the obligations of a processor that engages a sub-processor are to obtain the consent of the controller and ensure the sub-processor complies with data processing obligations that are equivalent to those that apply to the processor. The GDPR defines a processor as a natural or legal person, public authority, agency, or other body that processes personal data on behalf of the controller. A sub-processor is a third party that is engaged by the processor to carry out specific processing activities on behalf of the controller. The GDPR requires that the processor does not engage another processor without prior specific or general written authorization of the controller. In the case of general written authorization, the processor must inform the controller of any intended changes concerning the addition or replacement of other processors, thereby giving the controller the opportunity to object to such changes. The processor must also ensure that the same data protection obligations as set out in the contract or other legal act between the controller and the processor are imposed on that other processor by way of a contract or other legal act under Union or Member State law, .Reference:[GDPR Article 28], [CIPM - International Association of Privacy Professionals]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Sage
1 months ago
Option A - because it's always better to get approval from the higher-ups, even if they're still using their typewriters.
upvoted 0 times
Dyan
3 days ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stefany
10 days ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Geraldo
1 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Covering both privacy and consent is probably the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fausto
1 months ago
D seems like the safest option. Shifting the responsibility to the developer is a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
Gwen
2 days ago
D) Secure appropriate contractual concessions to ensure that the developer is primarily responsible for any violation of applicable privacy law.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
14 days ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlette
19 days ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Caprice
1 months ago
Definitely C. Informing the candidates and getting their consent is the ethical and legal thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
Annmarie
5 days ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonor
16 days ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dacia
1 months ago
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Rosalyn
2 months ago
I'm going with A. Securing stakeholder buy-in is essential to ensure the tool aligns with the organization's needs.
upvoted 0 times
Hermila
7 days ago
C) Distribute a notice to the candidates whose resumes the tool will assess to ensure they understand and consent to the use of the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mammie
8 days ago
I agree, getting stakeholder buy-in is crucial for successful implementation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wayne
10 days ago
B) Conduct an assessment of the tool's impact both on privacy and on conformity with applicable AI regulation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
16 days ago
A) Secure stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lauran
2 months ago
But we also need to consider privacy and regulation, so conducting an assessment is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melodie
2 months ago
I think B is the correct answer. Assessing the tool's impact on privacy and AI regulations is crucial before implementation.
upvoted 0 times
Jaime
1 months ago
Yes, getting stakeholder buy-in and approval is also crucial to ensure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
1 months ago
And we need to secure contractual concessions to hold the developer responsible for any privacy law violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
1 months ago
I agree, it's important to consider privacy and regulations before using the tool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Callie
1 months ago
Yes, that's important too. We should also distribute a notice to candidates to ensure they understand and consent to the tool's use.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
But don't we also need to get stakeholder buy-in and approval to ensure it meets our requirements?
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
2 months ago
I agree, assessing the tool's impact on privacy and AI regulations is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Oneida
2 months ago
I agree with Jess, it's important to make sure the tool meets the organization's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
3 months ago
I think the first step should be to secure stakeholder buy-in.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77