Huawei H12-831_V1.0 Exam Questions

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

To determine whether the statement is true or false, we need to analyze the OSPF network, the cost values of the links, the primary and backup paths, and the role of OSPF IP Fast Reroute (FRR) enabled on R1. Let's break it down step by step:

Understanding the Network Topology and Costs:

The network consists of four routers: R1, R2, R3, and R4.

The destination network is 10.0.3.3/32, located at R3.

The link costs are as follows:

R1 to R2: Cost = 10

R1 to R4: Cost = 10

R4 to R2: Cost = 20

R2 to R3: Cost = 5

The total cost of a path is the sum of the costs of all links in that path.

Calculating the Primary Path Cost (R1 -> R2 -> R3):

Path: R1 -> R2 (cost = 10) -> R3 (cost = 5)

Total cost = 10 + 5 = 15

This is the shortest path (lowest cost) from R1 to R3, as stated in the question. OSPF uses the Dijkstra algorithm to calculate the shortest path based on link costs, so R1 will naturally select R1 -> R2 -> R3 as the primary path to reach 10.0.3.3/32.

Calculating the Backup Path Cost (R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3):

Path: R1 -> R4 (cost = 10) -> R2 (cost = 20) -> R3 (cost = 5)

Total cost = 10 + 20 + 5 = 35

This path has a higher cost (35) compared to the primary path (15), which is expected for a backup path. The backup path is not used under normal conditions but is precomputed for fast failover in case the primary path fails.

Role of OSPF IP Fast Reroute (FRR):

OSPF IP FRR is a mechanism designed to provide fast convergence in case of link or node failures by precomputing backup paths. When enabled on R1, FRR ensures that R1 has a precomputed backup path to quickly switch traffic to an alternate route (e.g., R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3) if the primary path (R1 -> R2 -> R3) fails.

FRR typically uses Loop-Free Alternates (LFA) or other techniques to ensure the backup path does not create loops and is immediately available. In this case, the backup path R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3 is valid because:

It does not loop back to R1.

It reaches R3, the destination.

The cost (35) is higher than the primary path (15), but this is acceptable for a backup path.

The question states that OSPF IP FRR is enabled on R1, and the backup path is explicitly given as R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3. This aligns with FRR's purpose of maintaining a precomputed backup path.

Verifying the Statement:

The statement claims: ''The primary path from R1 to 10.0.3.3/32 is R1 -> R2 -> R3, and the backup path is R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3.''

We calculated that the primary path (R1 -> R2 -> R3) has a cost of 15, which is the shortest path and correct for OSPF's behavior.

The backup path (R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3) has a cost of 35, which is higher but valid as a backup path, especially with OSPF IP FRR enabled on R1 to ensure fast failover.

Both paths are correctly identified in the question, and OSPF IP FRR's presence on R1 supports the existence of a precomputed backup path. Therefore, the statement is accurate.

Conclusion:

The primary path (R1 -> R2 -> R3) and backup path (R1 -> R4 -> R2 -> R3) are correctly described, and OSPF IP FRR on R1 ensures the backup path is precomputed and ready for use. Thus, the statement is true.

Reference (Based on HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Concepts):

OSPF Path Calculation: HCIP-Datacom documentation on OSPF's Dijkstra algorithm and cost-based path selection (e.g., Section on OSPF Routing Metrics).

OSPF IP Fast Reroute (FRR): HCIP-Datacom coverage of FRR mechanisms, including Loop-Free Alternates and backup path computation (e.g., Chapter on OSPF Advanced Features and High Availability).

Link Cost and Path Optimization: HCIP-Datacom explanation of link cost configuration and OSPF path selection (e.g., Section on OSPF Network Design and Optimization).

Based on the provided image and the context of the HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology exam, I'll format and answer the question you've shared. I'll ensure the response is accurate, detailed, and aligned with the official HCIP-Datacom documentation, while correcting any typos and providing a comprehensive explanation. Since you've only provided one question in the image, I'll address it in the requested format. If there are additional questions, please share them, and I'll format and answer them similarly.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

1. Understanding the DIS (Designated Intermediate System) in IS-IS

In IS-IS, the DIS (Designated Intermediate System) is similar to the DR (Designated Router) in OSPF.

Unlike OSPF, IS-IS does not use an election based on priority; instead, the router with the highest priority becomes the DIS.

If there is a tie in priority, the router with the highest MAC address on the interface becomes the DIS.

The DIS is responsible for generating additional LSPs (pseudonode LSPs) for the link and synchronizing the database between routers.

2. How to Identify If the Router Is the DIS from the LSP

In the given LSP output, there are NO pseudonode LSPs (LSPs ending with .01).

The DIS is responsible for creating pseudonode LSPs, which represent a multi-access network in the IS-IS topology.

If the router were the DIS, it would generate both its own LSP (ending in .00) and a pseudonode LSP (ending in .01).

Since we only see an LSP ending in .00, this confirms that the router is NOT the DIS.

3. Evaluating the Answer Choices

Option A (TRUE) -- Correct:

Since no pseudonode LSP is present, the router is not the DIS.

This confirms that the statement is TRUE.

Option B (FALSE) -- Incorrect:

If the router were the DIS, it would generate pseudonode LSPs, but they are missing from the output.

Therefore, the statement is NOT false.

Final Answer:

Answe r: A (TRUE)

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Reference:

IS-IS Designated Intermediate System (DIS) Selection Process

Pseudonode LSP Generation in Multi-Access Networks

IS-IS LSP Structure and Identification of DIS

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

This question involves a complex network topology with IS-IS, iBGP, and route reflection, requiring an understanding of routing protocols, area boundaries, and route distribution. Let's analyze each statement step-by-step to determine which is true, based on HCIP-Datacom principles.

Network Overview:

IS-IS Configuration:

IS-IS runs on R1, R2, R4, and R5 in area 49.0001 (Level-1/Level-2).

IS-IS runs on R3 and R6 in area 49.0002 (Level-2 only, as implied by the figure).

The import-route isis level-2 into level-1 command on R2 and R5 allows Level-2 routes (from area 49.0002) to be injected into Level-1 routers (R1, R4) in area 49.0001.

BGP Configuration:

AS 65000 uses iBGP with R2 and R5 as Route Reflectors (RRs), and R1, R3, R4, and R6 as clients.

iBGP peer relationships use IP addresses 10.0.0.X/32, where X is the router number (e.g., R1 = 10.0.0.1/32, R4 = 10.0.0.4/32, etc.).

R1 and R4 import the external route 192.168.1.0/24 into BGP using import-route.

R3 and R6 import the external route 192.168.2.0/24 into BGP using import-route.

Topology Insights:

The figure shows R2 and R5 as central hubs connecting Level-1/Level-2 IS-IS areas and serving as RRs for iBGP.

R1 and R4 are in area 49.0001 (Level-1/Level-2), while R3 and R6 are in area 49.0002 (Level-2).

External routes (192.168.1.0/24 and 192.168.2.0/24) are injected into BGP and distributed via iBGP.

Analyzing Each Statement:

A . The routing table of R4 contains two equal-cost default routes.

Analysis:

In IS-IS, default routes (0.0.0.0/0) are typically generated by Level-2 routers and propagated to Level-1 routers if configured (e.g., via default-route-advertise).

R4 is a Level-1/Level-2 router in area 49.0001. It can learn default routes from R2 or R5 (Level-2 routers) if they advertise a default route.

However, the question does not indicate that R2 or R5 are configured to advertise default routes, nor does it specify equal-cost paths to a default route.

Given the import-route isis level-2 into level-1 on R2 and R5, Level-2 routes (including defaults, if any) are injected into Level-1, but there's no evidence of two equal-cost default routes in R4's routing table.

Additionally, IS-IS prefers the closest Level-2 router for default routes, and the topology suggests a single path (e.g., via R2 or R5), not two equal-cost paths.

Conclusion: This statement is false.

B . The route 192.168.2.0/24 in the routing table of R4 has two different outbound interfaces.

Analysis:

The route 192.168.2.0/24 is an external route imported into BGP by R3 and R6 (in area 49.0002) using import-route.

As RRs, R2 and R5 reflect this route to their iBGP clients, including R4 (in area 49.0001).

However, iBGP routes do not modify the next-hop by default unless next-hop-self is configured on the RR. The next-hop for 192.168.2.0/24 from R3/R6 would typically point to R3 or R6, not R2 or R5, unless modified.

R4, as an iBGP client, receives the route but needs an IGP (IS-IS) path to the next-hop (R3 or R6).

The import-route isis level-2 into level-1 on R2 and R5 allows R4 to learn IS-IS routes from area 49.0002, but the question does not indicate multiple equal-cost paths to R3 or R6 from R4.

In IS-IS, unless explicitly configured for equal-cost multipath (ECMP) with the same cost to R3 and R6, R4 would use a single outbound interface to reach 192.168.2.0/24.

The topology suggests a single path (e.g., via R2 or R5) to area 49.0002, not two equal-cost outbound interfaces.

Conclusion: This statement is false.

C . The routing table of R1 contains two equal-cost default routes.

Analysis:

Similar to R4, R1 is a Level-1/Level-2 router in area 49.0001. It can learn default routes from R2 or R5 if they advertise them.

The question does not specify that R2 or R5 are configured to advertise default routes, nor does it indicate multiple equal-cost paths to a default route.

IS-IS prefers the closest Level-2 router for default routes, and the topology (with R2 and R5 as central hubs) suggests a single path, not two equal-cost paths.

Without evidence of ECMP or specific default route configuration, R1 would not have two equal-cost default routes.

Conclusion: This statement is false.

D . The routing table of R1 contains the route 192.168.2.0/24.

Analysis:

The route 192.168.2.0/24 is an external route imported into BGP by R3 and R6 (in area 49.0002) using import-route.

R2 and R5, as Route Reflectors, reflect this iBGP route to their clients, including R1 (in area 49.0001).

iBGP ensures that the route is propagated within AS 65000, so R1, as an iBGP client of R2 and R5, will receive the 192.168.2.0/24 route.

For R1 to install this route in its routing table, it needs a valid IGP (IS-IS) path to the next-hop of the BGP route (likely R3 or R6).

The import-route isis level-2 into level-1 on R2 and R5 ensures that IS-IS Level-2 routes from area 49.0002 (including paths to R3 and R6) are injected into Level-1 routers like R1.

Therefore, R1 can resolve the next-hop for 192.168.2.0/24 via IS-IS and install the route in its routing table.

Conclusion: This statement is true.

Final Answer and Rationale:

The only true statement is D, as R1, being an iBGP client of R2 and R5, will receive and install the 192.168.2.0/24 route in its routing table, with IS-IS providing the necessary path to the next-hop.

Reference from HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Documents:

Huawei HCIP-Datacom V1.0 Training Manual, Chapter 4: IS-IS Configuration and Optimization, Sections on Level-1/Level-2 Interactions and Route Import.

Huawei HCIP-Datacom V1.0 Training Manual, Chapter 5: BGP Configuration and Optimization, Sections on Route Reflection and iBGP Route Distribution.

RFC 1195 (IS-IS) and RFC 4271 (BGP-4) for standard protocol behavior.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth

1. Understanding the DIS (Designated Intermediate System) in IS-IS

In IS-IS, the DIS (Designated Intermediate System) is similar to the DR (Designated Router) in OSPF.

Unlike OSPF, IS-IS does not use an election based on priority; instead, the router with the highest priority becomes the DIS.

If there is a tie in priority, the router with the highest MAC address on the interface becomes the DIS.

The DIS is responsible for generating additional LSPs (pseudonode LSPs) for the link and synchronizing the database between routers.

2. How to Identify If the Router Is the DIS from the LSP

In the given LSP output, there are NO pseudonode LSPs (LSPs ending with .01).

The DIS is responsible for creating pseudonode LSPs, which represent a multi-access network in the IS-IS topology.

If the router were the DIS, it would generate both its own LSP (ending in .00) and a pseudonode LSP (ending in .01).

Since we only see an LSP ending in .00, this confirms that the router is NOT the DIS.

3. Evaluating the Answer Choices

Option A (TRUE) -- Correct:

Since no pseudonode LSP is present, the router is not the DIS.

This confirms that the statement is TRUE.

Option B (FALSE) -- Incorrect:

If the router were the DIS, it would generate pseudonode LSPs, but they are missing from the output.

Therefore, the statement is NOT false.

Final Answer:

Answe r: A (TRUE)

HCIP-Datacom-Advanced Routing & Switching Technology Reference:

IS-IS Designated Intermediate System (DIS) Selection Process

Pseudonode LSP Generation in Multi-Access Networks

IS-IS LSP Structure and Identification of DIS