Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H35-480_V3.0 Topic 1 Question 35 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H35-480_V3.0 exam
Question #: 35
Topic #: 1
[All H35-480_V3.0 Questions]

If multiple IP addresses are planned for a gNodeB and the next-hop IP addresses are different, which of the following route configurations is more suitable?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the official Huawei documentation, the first message sent by a gNodeB to an AMF is NGAP_INIT_UE_MSG. This message is used to initiate a connection between the gNodeB and AMF.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Linsey
1 months ago
I'm going with C) Destination address route configuration. It's the only one that mentions the destination, and that's what really matters when you've got multiple IPs and next-hops, right?
upvoted 0 times
Yasuko
13 hours ago
Yeah, C) Destination address route configuration seems like the most logical choice for this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
2 days ago
I think so too, it's important to consider the destination when dealing with multiple IP addresses and next-hops.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
11 days ago
I agree, C) Destination address route configuration makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 months ago
A) Source address route configuration is the way to go, hands down. It's the only option that specifically mentions the source IP address, and that's got to be the key here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
2 months ago
D) Direct route configuration has got to be the answer. It's the most straightforward approach, and I like to keep things simple, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Marta
13 days ago
Direct route configuration is my choice too. It just makes everything easier to handle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
14 days ago
Dynamic route configuration might be more flexible, but direct route configuration is easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elliott
24 days ago
I agree, direct route configuration is the most straightforward option for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bulah
1 months ago
Direct route configuration is definitely the way to go. It's simple and efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joseph
2 months ago
B) Dynamic route configuration sounds like the way to go. That way, the routing table can automatically adjust as needed. Gotta love that adaptability!
upvoted 0 times
Timothy
1 months ago
Dynamic route configuration allows for flexibility and automatic adjustments in the routing table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lang
1 months ago
I agree, dynamic route configuration is definitely the way to go for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharika
2 months ago
That makes sense, but I still think C) Destination address route configuration is more suitable for multiple IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Julio
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is B) Dynamic route configuration because it can adapt to changes in next-hop IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Destination address route configuration. That seems like the most logical choice when dealing with multiple IP addresses and different next-hop addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharika
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Destination address route configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77