Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H13-629 Topic 1 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-629 exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 1
[All H13-629 Questions]

The customer online database runs on an OceanStor S5500T storage system. The database uses a total of 6 LUNs. Now it's time to put the number on the S5500T. Which of the following statemetns are correct regarding the use of array-side functions to complete the data migration? (multiple choice)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shawnda
1 months ago
Wait, there's an 'OceanStor S5500T' storage system? That sounds like something out of a sci-fi novel. I'm going with B and D, just to be safe.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selma
1 months ago
Ooh, LUN copy sounds interesting. I'm going to have to look into that. B and D for me!
upvoted 0 times
Felicitas
16 days ago
Adding multiple remote replication tasks to a consistency group can be helpful for managing multiple LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Margot
18 days ago
I prefer using LUN copy for data migration. It seems like a straightforward process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
19 days ago
I think using remote replication for online data migration is a good option as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
20 days ago
I agree, LUN copy does sound interesting. I think B and D are the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Justine
2 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote this question has dealt with a lot of database migration headaches in their time. Anyway, I'm going with B and D too.
upvoted 0 times
Delbert
18 days ago
Let's go with B and D then. That should cover our bases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
1 months ago
Definitely, being able to change the migration rate dynamically is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ariel
2 months ago
Yeah, I agree. And D sounds like a good option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
2 months ago
I think B is the way to go for online data migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Juan
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option A. I think option D might also be correct because it allows for dynamically changing the migration rate during the copy process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Malissa
2 months ago
I'm not sure about A - the question doesn't mention anything about consistency groups. I'd go with B and D as the best options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
2 months ago
I agree with Vivan. Option A seems like the right choice for completing data migration using remote replication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vivan
2 months ago
I think option A is correct because it mentions adding multiple remote replication tasks to a consistency group.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denae
2 months ago
I'm not sure about option D. Can we really dynamically change the migration rate during the copy process?
upvoted 0 times
...
Portia
2 months ago
I agree with Barbra. Option C also seems correct because after migration, no configuration is needed on the host to start the service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
2 months ago
I think option A is correct because we need to add multiple remote replication tasks to a consistency group for data migration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
3 months ago
Hmm, I think B and D are the correct answers here. The question specifically mentions remote replication, and the ability to dynamically change the migration rate during the copy process sounds like a useful feature.
upvoted 0 times
Fabiola
28 days ago
That's a good point, it's always best to consider all options before making a decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karol
1 months ago
I think we should also consider option A, as adding multiple remote replication tasks to a consistency group can be important for customer business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
1 months ago
Yes, and being able to dynamically change the migration rate during the copy process can be very helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristal
2 months ago
I agree, using remote replication for online data migration seems like the right choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77