Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H13-611 Topic 6 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H13-611 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 6
[All H13-611 Questions]

The following two descriptions are correct:

Description 1: Synchronous remote replication, when the primary storage fails, the amount of data lost can be 0.

Description 2: When the host is a Linux-based file system, asynchronous remote replication must be used.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kate
12 months ago
I believe description 1 is correct because synchronous replication can ensure zero data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
1 years ago
I disagree, I think only description 1 is correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florencia
1 years ago
I agree with Adelle, because synchronous replication can minimize data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
1 years ago
I think both descriptions are correct.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
1 years ago
I think description 2 is incorrect because I've used synchronous replication with Linux-based file systems before.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 years ago
I'm not sure about description 2, but it seems logical that different file systems may require different replication methods.
upvoted 0 times
...
Murray
1 years ago
But what about description 2? Is it true that asynchronous replication must be used with Linux-based file systems?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jani
1 years ago
I agree with synchronous replication does help prevent data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 years ago
I think description 1 is correct because synchronous replication can ensure no data loss.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emmanuel
1 years ago
Yeah, I'm with you on option B. The first part is correct, but the second part just doesn't seem to be accurate. I mean, who writes these questions, anyway? They need to work on their Linux knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shenika
1 years ago
Okay, let me think this through. If the primary storage fails in a synchronous remote replication setup, the amount of data lost should be 0, that makes sense. But the Linux file system part just doesn't seem right. I'm going to go with option B on this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barb
1 years ago
Haha, the exam writers are really trying to trip us up with this one, aren't they? I bet they're sitting back, sipping their coffee, and chuckling at all the confused faces in the room.
upvoted 0 times
France
1 years ago
I think you're right. These descriptions can be tricky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
1 years ago
B) Description 1 pair, description 2 wrong
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephaine
1 years ago
Yeah, I'm not sure about that second part either. I always thought asynchronous and synchronous remote replication could both be used with Linux file systems, it just depends on the specific requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tresa
1 years ago
I agree, the first part sounds on point, but the second part doesn't seem to fit. I think the Linux file system bit is throwing me off a bit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
1 years ago
Hmm, this question seems a bit tricky. The first description about synchronous remote replication losing no data when the primary storage fails seems correct, but the second description about asynchronous remote replication being required for Linux-based file systems doesn't sound quite right to me.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77