Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Huawei Exam H12-821_V1.0 Topic 1 Question 42 Discussion

Actual exam question for Huawei's H12-821_V1.0 exam
Question #: 42
Topic #: 1
[All H12-821_V1.0 Questions]

Which of the following statements regarding the stateful inspection firewall is true?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Nelida
11 days ago
Man, I'm glad I read through the options carefully. If I just saw 'stateful firewall' and picked the first answer, I would have been way off base. This stuff really requires understanding the core concepts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hildegarde
12 days ago
Option D sounds like it would be super inefficient. Matching every single packet against the full rule set? No way, that's not how a stateful firewall works at all.
upvoted 0 times
Arthur
8 hours ago
B) Because UDP is a connectionless protocol, so the stateful inspection firewall cannot match UDP packets with the status table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
3 days ago
A) When the stateful inspection firewall checks packets, packets of one same connection are not correlated.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Viola
15 days ago
Haha, option A is pretty funny. Of course the stateful firewall correlates packets of the same connection, that's the whole reason it's called 'stateful'!
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnda
21 days ago
I was a bit confused by option B. Just because UDP is connectionless, it doesn't mean the stateful firewall can't track and match UDP packets based on the connection state. That's kind of the whole point of stateful inspection!
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
23 days ago
But C makes sense because it would be more efficient to match subsequent packets directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
24 days ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. The stateful inspection firewall keeps track of the connection state, so it only needs to match the first packet against the rules, and then can quickly match subsequent packets in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
24 days ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Galen
25 days ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
28 days ago
But C makes sense because it would be more efficient to match subsequent packets directly in the state table.
upvoted 0 times
...
Magnolia
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
1 months ago
I think the answer is C.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77