Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HRCI Exam PHR Topic 5 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for HRCI's PHR exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 5
[All PHR Questions]

Your organization is using the whole job ranking technique as part of its non-quantitative job evaluation. Which one of the following best describes the whole job ranking technique?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Quid pro quo happens when the acceptance or decline of an unwanted sexual advance leads to a hiring, employment, or workplace decision.

Because Sammy refused the dinner date, Pat didn't hire Sammy.

Answer option A is incorrect. Covert is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option C is incorrect. Contingent is not a valid sexual harassment term.

Answer option D is incorrect. A hostile work environment describes unwelcome sexual conduct that interferes with a person's ability to complete their work, intimidation, or an offensive work environment.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Wilford
2 months ago
I'd like to rank the job of the person who wrote these answer choices from lowest to highest importance. That might be more entertaining than this exam.
upvoted 0 times
Beatriz
23 days ago
D) New jobs are categorized into an existing hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catherin
1 months ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mitzie
1 months ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleta
2 months ago
D) Categorizing new jobs into an existing hierarchy? That's like putting a square peg in a round hole. Not the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
2 months ago
C) This one seems the most accurate to me. Categorizing jobs into broad levels is a common approach in job evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
Lonny
4 days ago
D) New jobs are categorized into an existing hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Doretha
5 days ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stephen
13 days ago
B) Jobs are reviewed based on the entire performance of the organization in each category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carma
2 months ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
2 months ago
B) Hmm, reviewing the entire performance of the organization doesn't quite fit the description of 'job evaluation' in my opinion.
upvoted 0 times
Lemuel
2 months ago
C) Jobs are categorized into broad categories or levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
2 months ago
A) Jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mitsue
2 months ago
A) Seems logical, ranking jobs based on importance makes sense. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
Minna
21 days ago
C) I think categorizing jobs into broad categories or levels is more efficient for job evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucy
24 days ago
A) That could be a valid point, but I still believe ranking jobs based on importance is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clemencia
26 days ago
B) I think it's more about reviewing the overall performance of the organization in each category.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gene
2 months ago
A) Seems logical, ranking jobs based on importance makes sense. I'll go with that.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Freeman
3 months ago
I believe jobs are ranked from lowest to highest according to the importance that each job holds.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
3 months ago
I agree with Twanna. It helps in understanding the hierarchy of jobs within the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
3 months ago
I think the whole job ranking technique is about categorizing jobs into broad categories or levels.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77