Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE6-A73 Topic 2 Question 113 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A73 exam
Question #: 113
Topic #: 2
[All HPE6-A73 Questions]

Examine the attached diagram

Two AOS-CX switches are configured for VSX at the access layer, where servers attached to them. An SVI interface is configured for VLAN 10 and serves as the default gateway for VLAN 10. The ISL link between the switches fails, but the keepalive interface functions. Active gateway has been configured on the switches.

What is correct about access from the servers to the Core?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Honey
7 days ago
Ah, the old 'trick question' trick. I see what they're doing here. But I'm not going to fall for it - Server 2 is definitely isolated from the core, so C is the right answer. Nice try, though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hubert
10 days ago
Haha, looks like someone's trying to trick us with this question. But I'm not falling for it - the answer is clearly C. Server 2 is cut off from the core, no matter how many keepalive links they have.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
16 days ago
I'm not sure about the other options, but C is definitely the correct answer. If the ISL link has failed, Server 2 has no way to reach the core layer since the SVI interface is the only gateway and it's on the failed link.
upvoted 0 times
Sina
7 days ago
But what about Server 1? Can it still communicate with the core layer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
10 days ago
I think you're right, Server 2 won't be able to access the core layer without the ISL link.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vernell
1 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think the keepalive link should still allow Server 2 to access the core layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
1 months ago
But what about Server 2? Can it communicate with the core layer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernell
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Server 1 can access the core layer via both uplinks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
1 months ago
I think the answer is A) Server 2 can successfully access the core layer via the keepalive link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
1 months ago
Server 2 can definitely access the core layer via the keepalive link. The question clearly states that the ISL link has failed, but the keepalive interface is still functioning, so that's the only way for Server 2 to reach the core.
upvoted 0 times
Geraldo
27 days ago
B) Server 1 and Server 2 can communicate with each other via the core layer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vanna
28 days ago
Server 2 can definitely access the core layer via the keepalive link.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
29 days ago
A) Server 2 can successfully access the core layer via the keepalive link.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77