HP Exam HPE6-A69 Topic 4 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE6-A69 exam

Question #: 54
Topic #: 4

Company A and Company B are merging their BGP routed networks The companies have overlapping IP ranges and security concerns during the migration phase. Which Aruba CX 8325 functionality would help the merging of networks in a secure way?

AUse of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level

BUse of Aruba Gateway appliance to control the routes between merged networks

CUse of vsf capable switch to integrate the routing

DUse of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Willetta at Jan 28, 2025, 10:05 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE6-A69 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Delsie

2 months ago

D) virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking? Sounds like a cool way to handle this without risking the family jewels. I'm in!

upvoted 0 times

Billy

28 days ago

D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking

upvoted 0 times

...

Keneth

1 months ago

C) Use of vsf capable switch to integrate the routing

upvoted 0 times

...

Avery

1 months ago

B) Use of Aruba Gateway appliance to control the routes between merged networks

upvoted 0 times

...

Janine

1 months ago

A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level

upvoted 0 times

...

Carol

2 months ago

B) The Aruba Gateway appliance could work, but D) sounds more flexible and comprehensive for this use case.

upvoted 0 times

Stevie

1 months ago

B) I agree, D) seems like the best option for handling the overlapping IP ranges and security concerns.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kris

1 months ago

D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

1 months ago

B) Use of Aruba Gateway appliance to control the routes between merged networks

upvoted 0 times

...

Thurman

2 months ago

A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level

upvoted 0 times

...

Odelia

3 months ago

A) Using ACLs at the VLAN level is a classic solution, but it might be too restrictive for this scenario. I'd go with D).

upvoted 0 times

...

Beata

3 months ago

C) A VSF capable switch would be a good option to integrate the routing. It's a neat feature that can make the migration smoother.

upvoted 0 times

Quentin

2 months ago

C) A VSF capable switch would be a good option to integrate the routing. It's a neat feature that can make the migration smoother.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jerry

2 months ago

A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level

upvoted 0 times

...

Galen

3 months ago

I agree with Blondell, option D seems like the most secure and efficient solution for the merging of networks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ettie

3 months ago

D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking seems like the way to go. It will allow secure integration of the merged networks.

upvoted 0 times

Carlton

2 months ago

D) Use of virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking is a more secure option

upvoted 0 times

...

Iesha

3 months ago

A) Use of ACL's to separate the company networks at the VLAN level

upvoted 0 times

...

Blondell

3 months ago

I disagree, I believe option D is more suitable. Virtual route forwarding and BGP route leaking can ensure smooth integration.

upvoted 0 times

...

Launa

3 months ago

I think option A is the best choice. ACL's can help separate the networks securely.

upvoted 0 times

...