Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-V27 Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-V27 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All HPE0-V27 Questions]

Your customer needs a compute solution. Their aging data center can only supply 5kW per rack, which is below the 15kW required for your planned solution.

Which change could you recommend to satisfy the requirement while maintaining the planned solution's level of performance? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

HPE CloudPhysics is a SaaS-based platform that provides data-driven insights and recommendations for optimizing the performance, availability, and cost of virtualized environments. HPE CloudPhysics collects and analyzes data from various sources, such as hypervisors, VMs, storage, and network devices, and applies machine learning and analytics to identify and resolve issues, such as resource contention, misconfigurations, bottlenecks, and inefficiencies.HPE CloudPhysics can help you monitor and troubleshoot HPE Hyper-V environments, as well as compare and plan migrations to HPE GreenLake or other cloud platforms12.Reference:HPE CloudPhysics | HPE Store US,HPE CloudPhysics - Data Sheet


by Kimbery at Sep 16, 2024, 07:13 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-V27 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Brent
1 months ago
Haha, I'd love to see the look on the customer's face if you suggested going with the 'non-redundant power' option. That's a surefire way to get them to reconsider the entire project!
upvoted 0 times
Brittani
30 days ago
User 1: Maybe we should consider spreading the infrastructure across additional racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
1 months ago
Opting for non-redundant power supplies (option A) is a definite no-go. That would be a major reliability and availability concern.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
2 months ago
Hmm, capping the power consumption at 33% with BMC tools (option B) seems a bit risky. Wouldn't that significantly impact the solution's performance?
upvoted 0 times
Annabelle
17 days ago
User 3: Hosting the compute solution with a colocation provider (option D) could also be a good alternative.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merlyn
28 days ago
User 2: Maybe spreading the infrastructure across additional racks (option C) could be a better solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marshall
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, capping the power consumption at 33% could definitely impact performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
King
2 months ago
Option E, converting to HPE GreenLake, could also be a good choice. That way, the power and infrastructure management becomes the provider's responsibility.
upvoted 0 times
Justine
21 days ago
D) Host the compute solution with a colocation provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
23 days ago
A) Design the solution with non-redundant power supplies.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
2 months ago
C and D seem like the most reasonable options here. Spreading the infrastructure across additional racks and hosting with a colocation provider would allow you to work within the power constraints of the current data center.
upvoted 0 times
Margot
1 months ago
Agreed. Hosting with a colocation provider can also help us meet the power requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
1 months ago
That makes sense. By spreading across more racks, we can stay within the power limits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 months ago
D) Host the compute solution with a colocation provider.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carol
1 months ago
C) Spread the infrastructure across additional racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmanuel
2 months ago
I would also consider hosting the compute solution with a colocation provider as another option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
2 months ago
I agree with Merilyn. That way we can satisfy the requirement without compromising performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I think we should spread the infrastructure across additional racks.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77