Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-V26 Topic 5 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-V26 exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 5
[All HPE0-V26 Questions]

Your customer needs a server a maximum Of two processors that will provide high performance, manageability, expansion, and security.

Which server should you recommend?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

HPE MSA Health Check Tool is a web-based tool that provides a comprehensive health check of an HPE MSA 1060/2060/2062 storage array. The tool analyzes the array configuration, performance, and logs and provides a detailed report with recommendations based on HPE best practices. The tool can also generate a support ticket if any issues are detected.

The HPE MSA Health Check Tool is available for download from the HPE Support Center website1. The tool requires an active warranty or support contract for the array.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alpha
27 days ago
I heard the DL380 can also brew your morning coffee. Talk about a multi-talented server!
upvoted 0 times
Gregoria
10 days ago
A) DL560
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Meghann
29 days ago
The DL380 is like the Swiss Army knife of servers. It's got everything you need and more.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dylan
1 months ago
If I had to choose, I'd go with the DL380. It's a workhorse server that can handle just about anything you throw at it.
upvoted 0 times
Charlena
3 days ago
I think the DL560 might be a better option for managing expansion and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Effie
7 days ago
I agree, the DL380 is a reliable choice for high performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominque
1 months ago
I'm not sure about the DL110 or DL20 options. They sound a bit underpowered for the requirements described.
upvoted 0 times
Yuriko
6 days ago
User 3: DL560 could also be a good choice for high performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lizbeth
9 days ago
User 3: DL560 could also be a good option for high performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecily
12 days ago
User 2: I agree, DL380 is a solid choice for those requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
17 days ago
User 2: I agree, DL380 seems like the best option for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marilynn
25 days ago
User 1: I think DL380 would be the best option for high performance and manageability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abel
29 days ago
User 1: I think DL380 would be a good choice for high performance and manageability.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alva
2 months ago
The DL380 seems like the obvious choice here. It's known for its high performance, great manageability, and top-notch security features.
upvoted 0 times
Berry
9 days ago
User 4: The DL380 is known for its manageability and expansion capabilities though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lyndia
12 days ago
User 3: What about the DL560? It also has two processors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helaine
19 days ago
User 2: Yeah, I agree. It has high performance and great security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maricela
1 months ago
User 1: I think the DL380 would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stefania
2 months ago
I would go with DL560. It may be slightly more expensive, but it provides even better performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clarinda
2 months ago
I agree with Jesusita. DL380 is a popular choice for its manageability and expansion capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) DL380. It offers high performance and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
2 months ago
I personally prefer the DL560 for its high performance capabilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jettie
2 months ago
I agree with Zita, the DL380 has a good balance of performance and security features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
2 months ago
I think the DL380 would be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77