Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-J69 Topic 8 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J69 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 8
[All HPE0-J69 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

A customer purchased a Primera C6S0 array to replace several older 3PAR arrays. They plan to upgrade the system as each 3PAP reaches the end of its lease. The initial sizing included 100TB effective capacity for an Oracle database environment.

The first 3PAR to come off lease has 100TB of VDI boot images that support thousands of users.

Which addition to the Primera should you recommend?

A)

B)

C)

D)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Corazon
22 days ago
I'm no storage expert, but I'm pretty sure the answer is whichever one comes with a free unicorn. Those things are great for boosting VDI performance, I hear.
upvoted 0 times
Mohammad
3 days ago
I think Option B would be the best choice for adding capacity to the Primera.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentine
29 days ago
As a wise man once said, 'When in doubt, go with Option D - the one that says 'All of the above'.' Just kidding, but Option D does look pretty tempting!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ciara
1 months ago
Option A seems a bit too basic for this scenario. I mean, who wants to go with the 'vanilla' choice when you can get some extra spice with Option B or C?
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. The increased deduplication and compression capabilities could really help optimize the storage usage for those VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
6 days ago
User 1
upvoted 0 times
...
Candida
10 days ago
The increased deduplication and compression capabilities in Option C could definitely help with storage efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
19 days ago
I agree, Option C seems like the best fit for optimizing storage usage for the VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annmarie
27 days ago
Option C sounds like a good choice. The deduplication and compression features could be very beneficial.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gladys
2 months ago
I think Option B looks like the best choice here. The Primera array needs to handle a lot of VDI boot images, and Option B seems to offer the highest effective capacity for the workload.
upvoted 0 times
Kristel
2 days ago
Option B does look like it can handle the workload effectively with its high capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
5 days ago
Yes, Option B seems to be the most suitable addition to the Primera array for managing the VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
6 days ago
Option B does look like it can handle the workload effectively with its high effective capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shonda
9 days ago
I agree, Option B seems like the most suitable choice for handling the VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brande
13 days ago
Ahmed: That's true, Option B does seem to align well with the initial sizing for the Oracle database environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
19 days ago
User 3: I see your point, but I still think Option B is the best choice based on the capacity needed for the Oracle database environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
1 months ago
I agree, Option B does seem like the best choice for handling the VDI boot images efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 months ago
User 2: I think Option C could also be a good option, it looks like it could handle the workload effectively.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colene
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, Option B seems like the most suitable choice for handling the VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlene
2 months ago
I disagree. I believe Option C would be a better recommendation as it offers better performance for the Oracle database environment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
2 months ago
I agree with Carissa. Option A seems like the best choice to accommodate the VDI boot images.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carissa
2 months ago
I think we should recommend Option A because it provides additional storage capacity.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77