Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-J69 Topic 5 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J69 exam
Question #: 41
Topic #: 5
[All HPE0-J69 Questions]

You are proposing a StoreOnce solution to a customer that has always used tape for a backup target.

What should you suggest to ensure that the StoreOnce deduplication is correctly sized?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ernestine
5 days ago
Forget the StoreOnce, I'm more interested in the 'StoreEverywhere' solution. That way, I can lose my data in style!
upvoted 0 times
...
Hermila
8 days ago
B) DDAnalyzer seems like the obvious choice here. It's like the crystal ball of deduplication - you can't go wrong with that!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
10 days ago
I'm going with A) StoreOnce timeless storage. It just sounds so futuristic and cool, you know? Who needs tape when you have 'timeless storage'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
11 days ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Maybe C) proof of concept with StoreOnce VSA would be a good idea to get a hands-on feel for the solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
12 days ago
I'm not sure about the proof of concept, I think DDAnalyzer might also be a good option to consider for sizing the StoreOnce solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
15 days ago
I think the answer is B) DDAnalyzer. It's the perfect tool to analyze the customer's data and ensure the StoreOnce deduplication is correctly sized.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tula
20 days ago
I agree with Willow, a proof of concept would be the best way to determine the right size for StoreOnce deduplication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
25 days ago
I think we should suggest a proof of concept with StoreOnce VSA to ensure correct sizing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77