Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

HP Exam HPE0-J68 Topic 9 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J68 exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 9
[All HPE0-J68 Questions]

Your customer has very low deduplication ratio of their Linux VMs farm which is hosted on a HPE Alletra 9000 Which fllesystem type could cause this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jenelle
1 months ago
As an avid Linux enthusiast, I can say with confidence that Btrfs is the way to go. It's the file system of the future, or at least the one that makes the least sense in the present.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawanda
1 months ago
D) EXT3? Really? That's like asking which dinosaur would be best for a space mission. Come on, this has to be Btrfs!
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards A) XFS, as it's not known for its deduplication capabilities, especially on a high-end storage system.
upvoted 0 times
Eleonora
10 hours ago
EXT3 is definitely not the filesystem type to use for deduplication, so that's probably not the cause.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmen
8 days ago
EXT4 is also not known for its deduplication abilities, so that could be a factor as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
11 days ago
I'm not sure about Btrfs, but I know that EXT3 is definitely not known for its deduplication features.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
11 days ago
I've heard that Btrfs has better deduplication features, maybe that could be the issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
13 days ago
I've heard that EXT4 is also not great for deduplication, so that could be a possibility too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herschel
25 days ago
I think you might be right, XFS is not the best for deduplication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 months ago
I think you might be right, XFS is not the best for deduplication.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tammi
2 months ago
I'm going with B) EXT4. It's a widely-used and optimized file system that should provide good deduplication performance on enterprise storage like the HPE Alletra 9000.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Maybe the customer needs to consider switching to a different filesystem type for better deduplication ratio.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe EXT4 could be the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nohemi
2 months ago
I think the filesystem type causing the low deduplication ratio could be XFS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Btrfs. It's known to have lower deduplication ratios compared to other file systems like XFS and EXT4.
upvoted 0 times
Ilda
19 days ago
Yes, Btrfs could be the reason for the low deduplication ratio in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
23 days ago
I agree, Btrfs is known for its lower deduplication ratios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Colette
29 days ago
I think EXT4 might also be a good option for higher deduplication ratios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hoa
1 months ago
Yes, Btrfs could definitely be the cause of the low deduplication ratio in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Claribel
1 months ago
I agree, Btrfs is known for its lower deduplication ratios.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
1 months ago
I would go with A) XFS, it's known for better deduplication ratios compared to Btrfs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
1 months ago
I agree, Btrfs is not as efficient in deduplication as XFS or EXT4.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
1 months ago
I think the answer is C) Btrfs. It's known to have lower deduplication ratios compared to other file systems like XFS and EXT4.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lettie
2 months ago
But XFS is known to have issues with deduplication, that's why I think it's the reason.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe EXT4 could be the culprit here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
2 months ago
I think the filesystem type causing low deduplication ratio could be XFS.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77