Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HP Exam HPE0-J68 Topic 10 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for HP's HPE0-J68 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 10
[All HPE0-J68 Questions]

A customer needs to be manually map out preferred paths within a multi-switch fabric, based on application ,priority ,and topology, while allowing failover to a non-preferred path if the

preferred path fails, Which B-series FC switch functionality should be used to provide this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Lore at Jun 24, 2024, 11:34 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium HPE0-J68 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Taryn
29 days ago
I'm going to go with C) Frame filtering. It's the most specific and targeted functionality for the job at hand. Plus, who doesn't love a good old-fashioned 'frame' filtering, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 months ago
I'm going with B) Enhanced group management. It's got to be the most comprehensive solution, right? Why settle for anything less than the full package?
upvoted 0 times
German
8 days ago
User 3: I see your point, but I still think B) Enhanced group management is the way to go for a comprehensive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Irene
9 days ago
User 2: I disagree, I believe D) Traffic isolation Zones would be more effective for failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Oretha
12 days ago
User 1: I think A) Quality of services might be a better option for prioritizing paths.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
1 months ago
Ha! I bet the exam writers are just trying to trip us up. They're probably going to mark the wrong answer as correct, just to see who's paying attention.
upvoted 0 times
Theron
4 days ago
B) Enhanced group management
upvoted 0 times
...
Aileen
25 days ago
A) Quality of services
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Myra
2 months ago
I'm not so sure about that. I think D) Traffic isolation Zones might be the better option here. It seems to provide the level of control and flexibility the customer needs.
upvoted 0 times
Karrie
10 days ago
User 3: I agree with Karrie, D) Traffic isolation Zones sounds like the best choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vernice
26 days ago
User 2: User Comment: I'm not so sure about that. I think D) Traffic isolation Zones might be the better option here. It seems to provide the level of control and flexibility the customer needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalya
1 months ago
User 1: I think A) Quality of services could work for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Crissy
2 months ago
The answer is clearly C) Frame filtering. That's the functionality that allows you to manually map out preferred paths based on application, priority, and topology, with failover support if the preferred path fails.
upvoted 1 times
Vicki
1 months ago
A: I think the answer is D) Traffic isolation Zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Benton
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think A) Quality of services could also be a valid option for mapping out preferred paths based on priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Phyliss
2 months ago
I agree with Wava, because Traffic isolation Zones allow for failover to a non-preferred path if the preferred path fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wava
2 months ago
I think the answer is D) Traffic isolation Zones.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77