Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Hitachi Vantara Exam HQT-4420 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Hitachi Vantara's HQT-4420 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All HQT-4420 Questions]

In the event of a SAN-attached G10 node failure, which LUN configuration will maintain access to a given set of data LUNs?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, C

When performing a six-drive upgrade on an HCP G10 with local storage:

RAID level and Virtual Disks will be created automatically (A): This is correct. The system automatically handles the RAID configuration and creation of virtual disks to ensure that the new drives are correctly integrated into the existing storage structure.

The node is online during this procedure (C): This is also correct. The upgrade can be performed while the node remains online, minimizing disruption to the system's operation and ensuring continuous availability. These procedures are documented in the 'HCP G10 Maintenance and Upgrade Guide,' which outlines the steps for online upgrades and automatic RAID configuration.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Germaine
1 months ago
I heard the correct answer is 'Turning it off and on again'. Works every time, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
1 months ago
Data Protection Level 2 seems like a solid choice, but I can't help but wonder if there's a more 'zero-copy' solution out there.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
12 days ago
D) Dynamic multi-pathing could also be a good option for maintaining access to data LUNs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valda
13 days ago
C) Zero Copy Failover might be worth considering for faster failover.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
18 days ago
A) Data Protection Level 2 sounds like a safe bet.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hyun
1 months ago
Oh man, this question is making my brain hurt. I'm gonna go with 'HCP LUN replicator' and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
Dusti
17 days ago
'Zero Copy Failover' seems like the best option to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bethanie
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards 'Data Protection Level 2' for this one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kiley
1 months ago
I think I'll go with 'Dynamic multi-pathing' as the answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gertude
2 months ago
Dynamic multi-pathing sounds like it could be the answer, but I'm not convinced. Gotta do some more research on these SAN-attached nodes.
upvoted 0 times
Jennie
12 days ago
Let's look into Zero Copy Failover for more information.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
24 days ago
I believe Data Protection Level 2 is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimi
1 months ago
I think Dynamic multi-pathing is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
But wouldn't Zero Copy Failover ensure continuous access to the data LUNs in case of a node failure?
upvoted 0 times
...
James
2 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think 'Zero Copy Failover' is the way to go, but I'm not entirely sure.
upvoted 0 times
Edna
1 months ago
I agree, it's the most reliable choice in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 months ago
I think 'Zero Copy Failover' is the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lynsey
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Dynamic multi-pathing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Zero Copy Failover.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77