Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HashiCorp Exam Vault-Associate Topic 6 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for HashiCorp's HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 6
[All HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) Questions]

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will succeed.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will fail. The second command is vault kv put secret/creds passcode=my-long-passcode. This command attempts to write a secret named creds with the value passcode=my-long-passcode to the secret path, which is the default path for the kv secrets engine. However, the kv secrets engine is not enabled at the secret path, as shown by the first command vault secrets list, which lists the enabled secrets engines and their paths. The only enabled secrets engine is the transit secrets engine at the transit path. Therefore, the second command will fail with an error message saying that no secrets engine is mounted at the path secret/. To make the second command succeed, the kv secrets engine must be enabled at the secret path or another path, using the vault secrets enable command. For example, vault secrets enable -path=secret kv would enable the kv secrets engine at the secret path.Reference:kv - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer,vault secrets enable - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer


by Sherly at Apr 25, 2024, 08:57 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Vault-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Larae
2 days ago
I think it will succeed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
16 days ago
I agree, the second command in the GUI CLI will not succeed
upvoted 0 times
...
Amira
17 days ago
I think the answer is B) False
upvoted 0 times
Benedict
6 days ago
Thank you for clarifying
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
7 days ago
Yes, most likely
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
8 days ago
So, the answer is probably B) False then
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
9 days ago
That's true, it's not always straightforward
upvoted 0 times
...
Cecil
10 days ago
Because the second command in the GUI CLI usually requires additional steps to succeed
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilson
11 days ago
Why do you think it's false?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jenelle
12 days ago
I think the answer is B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77