Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HashiCorp Exam Vault-Associate Topic 4 Question 10 Discussion

Actual exam question for HashiCorp's HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) exam
Question #: 10
Topic #: 4
[All HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) Questions]

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will succeed.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will fail. The second command is vault kv put secret/creds passcode=my-long-passcode. This command attempts to write a secret named creds with the value passcode=my-long-passcode to the secret path, which is the default path for the kv secrets engine. However, the kv secrets engine is not enabled at the secret path, as shown by the first command vault secrets list, which lists the enabled secrets engines and their paths. The only enabled secrets engine is the transit secrets engine at the transit path. Therefore, the second command will fail with an error message saying that no secrets engine is mounted at the path secret/. To make the second command succeed, the kv secrets engine must be enabled at the secret path or another path, using the vault secrets enable command. For example, vault secrets enable -path=secret kv would enable the kv secrets engine at the secret path.Reference:kv - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer,vault secrets enable - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer


by Nickolas at Feb 13, 2024, 05:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Vault-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Marlon
1 days ago
I'm not sure, maybe the second command has different requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathern
2 days ago
I think it will succeed because the first command was successful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
24 days ago
Hmm, good point. This is a tricky one. I think I'm going to go with 'False' as well. The wording of the question just seems a bit off to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sage
25 days ago
I don't know, the image makes me a little skeptical. It looks like some kind of terminal or console window, which doesn't really fit with a 'GUI CLI.' I'm leaning towards 'False' on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Jestine
8 days ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Reuben
9 days ago
No way, that image looks suspicious. 'False' all the way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
10 days ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
Jose
11 days ago
Really? I thought the same thing. I'm going with 'False' too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
12 days ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annice
26 days ago
Well, the question says 'Running the second command in the GUI CLI will succeed.' So I'm assuming the correct answer is 'True'. The image doesn't really matter, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeanice
27 days ago
I'm not sure about this one. The question is a bit ambiguous, and the image doesn't seem to provide much context. What do you all think?
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77