Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HashiCorp Exam Vault-Associate Topic 1 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for HashiCorp's HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 1
[All HashiCorp Certified: Vault Associate (002) Questions]

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will succeed.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Running the second command in the GUI CLI will fail. The second command is vault kv put secret/creds passcode=my-long-passcode. This command attempts to write a secret named creds with the value passcode=my-long-passcode to the secret path, which is the default path for the kv secrets engine. However, the kv secrets engine is not enabled at the secret path, as shown by the first command vault secrets list, which lists the enabled secrets engines and their paths. The only enabled secrets engine is the transit secrets engine at the transit path. Therefore, the second command will fail with an error message saying that no secrets engine is mounted at the path secret/. To make the second command succeed, the kv secrets engine must be enabled at the secret path or another path, using the vault secrets enable command. For example, vault secrets enable -path=secret kv would enable the kv secrets engine at the secret path.Reference:kv - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer,vault secrets enable - Command | Vault | HashiCorp Developer


by Abel at Mar 21, 2024, 02:53 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Vault-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lawanda
1 days ago
True
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
2 days ago
False
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerlene
24 days ago
I agree with the previous candidates. The 'GUI CLI' part is throwing me off a bit. I think I'll go with 'False' as well, unless someone can convince me otherwise with a solid argument.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
25 days ago
Haha, 'GUI CLI' - that's a new one! I wonder if the exam authors are trying to trip us up with some fancy terminology. I'm going to go with 'False' too, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
Denae
10 days ago
Haha, 'GUI CLI' - that's a new one! I wonder if the exam authors are trying to trip us up with some fancy terminology. I'm going to go with 'False' too, just to be on the safe side.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystal
11 days ago
B) False
upvoted 0 times
...
Lonna
12 days ago
A) True
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Zana
26 days ago
Hmm, I'm leaning towards 'False' on this one. The GUI CLI might have some additional functionality or constraints that could impact the success of the second command. It's better to be cautious with these types of questions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paris
27 days ago
This question seems a bit tricky. The image shows a GUI CLI, but the question is asking about the second command. I'm not sure if the GUI CLI behaves the same way as a regular CLI.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77