Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HashiCorp Exam Vault-Associate Topic 8 Question 29 Discussion

Actual exam question for HashiCorp's Vault-Associate exam
Question #: 29
Topic #: 8
[All Vault-Associate Questions]

You are performing a high number of authentications in a short amount of time. You're experiencing slow throughput for token generation. How would you solve this problem?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Batch tokens are a type of tokens that are not persisted in Vault's storage backend, but are encrypted blobs that carry enough information to perform Vault actions. Batch tokens are extremely lightweight and scalable, and can improve the throughput for token generation. Batch tokens are suitable for high-volume and ephemeral workloads, such as containers or serverless functions, that require short-lived and non-renewable tokens. Batch tokens can be created by using the -type=batch flag in the vault token create command, or by configuring the token_type parameter in the auth method's role or mount options. Batch tokens have some limitations compared to service tokens, such as the lack of renewal, revocation, listing, accessor, and cubbyhole features.Therefore, batch tokens should be used with caution and only when the trade-offs are acceptable.Reference: https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/tutorials/tokens/batch-tokens1, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/commands/token/create2, https://developer.hashicorp.com/vault/docs/concepts/tokens#token-types3


by Jolene at Sep 17, 2024, 04:54 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Vault-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sherita
7 months ago
Haha, I can just imagine the poor server trying to keep up with all those authentication requests. Option C is the way to go, no doubt.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dortha
7 months ago
Option A? Nah, increasing token TTL won't solve the throughput issue. This is more of a capacity problem, not a token lifetime one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carlee
7 months ago
D, for sure. Reducing the number of policies will lighten the load on the token generation process. Simple and effective!
upvoted 0 times
Lucille
6 months ago
User 3: Agreed, D is the way to go. It will lighten the load on token generation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosamond
6 months ago
User 2: Yeah, reducing the number of policies attached to the tokens seems like a straightforward solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bettina
6 months ago
User 1: I think D is the best option. It will definitely help with the slow throughput issue.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ressie
7 months ago
I'm torn between B and C. Batch tokens could help, but a rate limit quota might be the more reliable solution. Hmm, decisions, decisions.
upvoted 0 times
Sharika
6 months ago
C) Establish a rate limit quota
upvoted 0 times
...
Torie
6 months ago
B) Implement batch tokens
upvoted 0 times
...
Tess
7 months ago
A) Increase the time-to-live on service tokens
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
7 months ago
I think establishing a rate limit quota could also help improve throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
8 months ago
I disagree, I believe implementing batch tokens would be more efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Augustine
8 months ago
I think we should increase the time-to-live on service tokens.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tasia
8 months ago
Option C - Establish a rate limit quota. That seems like the most straightforward way to manage the high volume of authentications and improve throughput.
upvoted 0 times
Malinda
7 months ago
Let's go ahead and implement that solution then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
7 months ago
Agreed, it would definitely help improve throughput.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rodney
7 months ago
That sounds like a good idea to manage the high volume of authentications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
7 months ago
I think we should establish a rate limit quota.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77