Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

HashiCorp Exam Vault-Associate Topic 3 Question 18 Discussion

Actual exam question for HashiCorp's Vault-Associate exam
Question #: 18
Topic #: 3
[All Vault-Associate Questions]

Which of the following statements describe the secrets engine in Vault? Choose three correct answers.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

An authentication method should be selected for a use case based on the auth method that best establishes the identity of the client. The identity of the client is the basis for assigning a set of policies and permissions to the client in Vault. Different auth methods have different ways of verifying the identity of the client, such as using passwords, tokens, certificates, cloud credentials, etc. Depending on the use case, some auth methods may be more suitable or convenient than others. For example, for human users, the userpass or ldap auth methods may be easy to use, while for machines or applications, the approle or aws auth methods may be more secure and scalable. The choice of the auth method should also consider the trade-offs between security, performance, and usability.Reference:Auth Methods | Vault | HashiCorp Developer,Authentication - Concepts | Vault | HashiCorp Developer


by Hyman at May 28, 2024, 01:18 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Vault-Associate Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Arlyne
1 months ago
E has got to be wrong, that doesn't make any sense. I'm confident A, D, and C are the way to go. Vault's secrets engine is pretty flexible, gotta love it!
upvoted 0 times
Gracia
2 days ago
I think we're on the same page. Vault's secrets engine is really powerful.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
9 days ago
Yeah, E does sound off. Vault's secrets engine is definitely flexible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristel
12 days ago
I agree, A, D, and C are the correct statements about the secrets engine.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Denae
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the person who wrote option B has never actually used Vault. Of course you can disable a secrets engine, what were they thinking? A, D, and C for me.
upvoted 0 times
Shelton
4 days ago
Yeah, option B doesn't make sense. A, D, and C are the correct answers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edelmira
11 days ago
I think the person who wrote option B made a mistake. A, D, and C make more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hester
24 days ago
I agree, option B is definitely not accurate. A, D, and C are the correct choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about B. Once enabled, you can't disable the secrets engine? That doesn't seem right. I'm going with A, D, and C.
upvoted 0 times
Lezlie
5 days ago
Yes, you can definitely disable a secrets engine. A, D, and C are the right choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alaine
1 months ago
I agree, B is wrong. A, D, and C are the correct statements about the secrets engine.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karrie
1 months ago
I think B is incorrect. You can disable the secrets engine after enabling it.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
2 months ago
A, D, and C seem to be the correct answers. The secrets engine in Vault allows you to store and read data, and each engine is isolated to its own path. Plus, you can build custom engines - that's a pretty cool feature!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mollie
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the second statement. I think once enabled, you can disable the secrets engine if needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
2 months ago
I agree with you, Clare. I also believe that you can build your own custom secrets engine in Vault.
upvoted 0 times
...
Clare
2 months ago
I think the secrets engine in Vault is really important for storing and reading data.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77