Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Machine Learning Engineer Topic 6 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Machine Learning Engineer exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 6
[All Professional Machine Learning Engineer Questions]

Your data science team needs to rapidly experiment with various features, model architectures, and hyperparameters. They need to track the accuracy metrics for various experiments and use an API to query the metrics over time. What should they use to track and report their experiments while minimizing manual effort?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The best option to build a comprehensive system that recommends images to users that are similar in appearance to their own uploaded images is to download a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN), and use the model to generate embeddings of the input images. Embeddings are low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional data that capture the essential features and semantics of the data. By using a pretrained CNN, you can leverage the knowledge learned from large-scale image datasets, such as ImageNet, and apply it to your own domain. A pretrained CNN can be used as a feature extractor, where the output of the last hidden layer (or any intermediate layer) is taken as the embedding vector for the input image. You can then measure the similarity between embeddings using a distance metric, such as cosine similarity or Euclidean distance, and recommend images that have the highest similarity scores to the user's uploaded image. Option A is incorrect because downloading a pretrained CNN and fine-tuning the model to predict hashtags based on the input images may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as hashtags may not reflect the appearance of the images accurately. For example, two images of different breeds of dogs may have the same hashtag #dog, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, fine-tuning the model may require additional data and computational resources, and it may not generalize well to new images that have different or missing hashtags. Option B is incorrect because retrieving image labels and dominant colors from the input images using the Vision API may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as labels and colors may not reflect the fine-grained details of the images. For example, two images of the same breed of dog may have different labels and colors depending on the background, lighting, and angle of the image. Moreover, using the Vision API may incur additional costs and latency, and it may not be able to handle custom or domain-specific labels. Option C is incorrect because using the provided hashtags to create a collaborative filtering algorithm may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as collaborative filtering relies on the ratings or preferences of users, not the features of the images. For example, two images of different animals may have similar ratings or preferences from users, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, collaborative filtering may suffer from the cold start problem, where new images or users that have no ratings or preferences cannot be recommended.Reference:

Image similarity search with TensorFlow

Image embeddings documentation

Pretrained models documentation

Similarity metrics documentation


Contribute your Thoughts:

Blondell
1 months ago
Hold up, did someone say 'Cloud Monitoring'? I thought we were trying to automate things, not create more manual work. Kubeflow Pipelines is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Stefan
9 days ago
C) Yeah, Cloud Monitoring sounds like it would add more manual work. Kubeflow Pipelines is the best option for tracking and reporting experiments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adaline
15 days ago
B) I agree, Kubeflow Pipelines will definitely help automate the process and save time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Moon
16 days ago
A) Use Kubeflow Pipelines to execute the experiments Export the metrics file, and query the results using the Kubeflow Pipelines API.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Maryann
2 months ago
A shared Google Sheets file? Really? That's like using a water pistol to put out a forest fire. Kubeflow Pipelines is clearly the superior choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Ben
10 days ago
C) Use Al Platform Training to execute the experiments Write the accuracy metrics to Cloud Monitoring, and query the results using the Monitoring API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Precious
1 months ago
B) Use Al Platform Training to execute the experiments Write the accuracy metrics to BigQuery, and query the results using the BigQueryAPI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 months ago
A) Use Kubeflow Pipelines to execute the experiments Export the metrics file, and query the results using the Kubeflow Pipelines API.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 months ago
I'm all about that BigQuery life. Storing the metrics in BigQuery and querying them through the API seems like a solid approach. Plus, I hear it's great for scaling.
upvoted 0 times
Margret
3 days ago
I agree, using BigQuery for storing and querying metrics can really streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rupert
4 days ago
B) Use Al Platform Training to execute the experiments Write the accuracy metrics to BigQuery, and query the results using the BigQuery API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
26 days ago
That's a smart choice! BigQuery is definitely great for handling large datasets and scaling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
1 months ago
B) Use Al Platform Training to execute the experiments Write the accuracy metrics to BigQuery, and query the results using the BigQuery API.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Eun
2 months ago
I prefer using Al Platform Training and writing the accuracy metrics to BigQuery. It's more efficient for our team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annita
2 months ago
I agree with Nickolas. Kubeflow Pipelines will help us minimize manual effort and easily query the metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kate
2 months ago
I agree, Kubeflow Pipelines is the way to go. Anything that minimizes manual effort is a win in my book. Plus, it just sounds cooler than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
Jerry
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, anything that minimizes manual effort is a win. Kubeflow Pipelines does sound cooler than the other options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should use Kubeflow Pipelines for tracking and reporting experiments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mona
2 months ago
Kubeflow Pipelines seems like the right choice here. It's designed for ML experimentation and tracking, and the API makes it easy to query the results.
upvoted 0 times
Daisy
1 months ago
A) Use Kubeflow Pipelines to execute the experiments Export the metrics file, and query the results using the Kubeflow Pipelines API.
upvoted 0 times
...
Haydee
1 months ago
BigQuery is powerful for storing metrics, but Kubeflow Pipelines might be more efficient for tracking.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauryn
2 months ago
B) Use Al Platform Training to execute the experiments Write the accuracy metrics to BigQuery, and query the results using the BigQueryAPI.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jin
2 months ago
Kubeflow Pipelines is great for tracking experiments and the API is convenient for querying.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
2 months ago
A) Use Kubeflow Pipelines to execute the experiments Export the metrics file, and query the results using the Kubeflow Pipelines API.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nickolas
3 months ago
I think we should use Kubeflow Pipelines to track and report our experiments.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77