Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Security Engineer Topic 3 Question 82 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Security Engineer exam
Question #: 82
Topic #: 3
[All Professional Cloud Security Engineer Questions]

You are the security admin of your company. You have 3,000 objects in your Cloud Storage bucket. You do not want to manage access to each object individually. You also do not want the uploader of an object to always have full control of the object. However, you want to use Cloud Audit Logs to manage access to your bucket.

What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marquetta
2 months ago
Haha, option A is like putting a welcome mat in front of your house and saying 'Hey, everyone, come on in!'
upvoted 0 times
Glory
6 days ago
Yeah, option D with Uniform bucket-level access and IAM management is the way to go for better security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawnta
7 days ago
I agree, setting up a default bucket ACL and managing access with IAM seems like a better choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beckie
24 days ago
Haha, definitely don't want to invite everyone in with option A!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herminia
26 days ago
Option A is definitely not the way to go. It's too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jennie
1 months ago
Yeah, option D with Uniform bucket-level access and IAM management is the most secure choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
France
1 months ago
I agree, setting up a default bucket ACL and managing access with IAM seems like a better option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristian
2 months ago
Option A is definitely not the way to go. It's too risky.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlee
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure if B is a good idea. Giving read access to all users might not be the best security practice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josefa
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Wouldn't setting up an ACL with READER permission to a scope of allUsers be easier?
upvoted 0 times
...
Phillip
2 months ago
D sounds like the right answer. Uniform bucket-level access is the recommended practice for large storage buckets.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
29 days ago
Yes, it simplifies access management and ensures consistent permissions across all objects in the bucket.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittni
1 months ago
I agree, setting up Uniform bucket-level access is the best option for managing access to a large number of objects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felix
2 months ago
I agree with Darnell. Using IAM for managing access seems like the most secure option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Andree
2 months ago
I think option C is the way to go. Managing access through IAM is more secure and granular than using ACLs.
upvoted 0 times
Shayne
15 days ago
Yes, using Uniform bucket-level access with IAM is a secure way to manage access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
16 days ago
D) Set up Uniform bucket-level access on the Cloud Storage bucket and manage access for users using IAM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorian
2 months ago
That sounds like a good idea. IAM provides more control over access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
2 months ago
C) Set up a default bucket ACL and manage access for users using IAM.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darnell
2 months ago
I think we should set up Uniform bucket-level access on the Cloud Storage bucket and manage access for users using IAM.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marion
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. Setting up a default bucket ACL and managing access for users using IAM could also work well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walker
3 months ago
I agree with Brent. It's the best option to manage access to the bucket efficiently.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brent
3 months ago
I think we should set up Uniform bucket-level access on the Cloud Storage bucket and manage access for users using IAM.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77