Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Security Engineer Topic 2 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Security Engineer exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Security Engineer Questions]

An organization's typical network and security review consists of analyzing application transit routes, request handling, and firewall rules. They want to enable their developer teams to deploy new applications without the overhead of this full review.

How should you advise this organization?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Brynn
1 months ago
Option B all the way! Enforcing policies through code is the way to go. Plus, it's a great way to keep the developers on their toes. I bet they'll be writing the most secure code ever. Or, you know, just finding creative ways to bypass the rules. Either way, it's a win-win!
upvoted 0 times
...
Mira
1 months ago
Forseti with Firewall filters? Sounds like a bunch of tech-y mumbo jumbo to me. I'm just going to go with whatever option has the least amount of work for the developers. They're the ones who have to deal with this stuff, right?
upvoted 0 times
Miriam
6 days ago
Forseti with Firewall filters? Sounds like a bunch of tech-y mumbo jumbo to me. I'm just going to go with whatever option has the least amount of work for the developers. They're the ones who have to deal with this stuff, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
17 days ago
D) All production applications will run on-premises. Allow developers free rein in GCP as their dev and QA platforms.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
19 days ago
B) Mandate use of infrastructure as code and provide static analysis in the CI/CD pipelines to enforce policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Olga
20 days ago
B) Mandate use of infrastructure as code and provide static analysis in the CI/CD pipelines to enforce policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krissy
22 days ago
A) Use Forseti with Firewall filters to catch any unwanted configurations in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linn
2 months ago
Allowing developers free rein in GCP as their dev and QA platforms? That's a recipe for disaster! I can't believe that's even an option. On-premises all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
Beckie
21 days ago
Allowing developers free rein in GCP as their dev and QA platforms? That's a recipe for disaster! I can't believe that's even an option. On-premises all the way, baby!
upvoted 0 times
...
Edna
27 days ago
B) Mandate use of infrastructure as code and provide static analysis in the CI/CD pipelines to enforce policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
1 months ago
A) Use Forseti with Firewall filters to catch any unwanted configurations in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annabelle
2 months ago
I'm not sure about routing all VPC traffic through customer-managed routers. That sounds like a lot of overhead and complexity just to detect malicious patterns. I'd go with the infrastructure as code approach.
upvoted 0 times
Billye
2 months ago
B) Mandate use of infrastructure as code and provide static analysis in the CI/CD pipelines to enforce policies.
upvoted 0 times
...
Darci
2 months ago
A) Use Forseti with Firewall filters to catch any unwanted configurations in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearline
2 months ago
Option B seems like a solid choice. Enforcing policies through static analysis in the CI/CD pipeline is a great way to ensure security without slowing down the developers.
upvoted 0 times
Tricia
27 days ago
User 4: Using infrastructure as code can definitely streamline the process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Emogene
1 months ago
User 3: It's important to maintain security without hindering the developers' workflow.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brett
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, enforcing policies through static analysis in the CI/CD pipeline is efficient.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
2 months ago
User 1: Option B seems like a solid choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brock
3 months ago
I see both points, but I think option B is more practical for enabling developer teams to deploy new applications without full review.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madalyn
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe option A is more effective. Forseti with Firewall filters can catch any unwanted configurations in production.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
3 months ago
I think option B is the best choice. It ensures security policies are enforced during deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77