Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Topic 5 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 5
[All Professional Cloud DevOps Engineer Questions]

You use Spinnaker to deploy your application and have created a canary deployment stage in the pipeline. Your application has an in-memory cache that loads objects at start time. You want to automate the comparison of the canary version against the production version. How should you configure the canary analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Cassandra
1 months ago
Option E: Compare the canary to a random person walking by the data center. You know, for an extra layer of analysis!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
1 months ago
Option C all the way! Anything else would just be like trying to catch a unicorn with a butterfly net. Let's stick to the basics and compare the canary to the current production version.
upvoted 0 times
Cherry
8 days ago
Definitely, simplicity is key. Option C it is for automating the comparison of the canary deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
10 days ago
Yeah, let's not overcomplicate things. Comparing the canary to the current production version is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Geoffrey
11 days ago
I agree, trying to catch a unicorn with a butterfly net doesn't sound very effective. Let's stick to the basics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mertie
16 days ago
Option C sounds good to me. Let's keep it simple and compare the canary to the current production version.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alverta
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option D seems interesting, but it might be overkill for a simple canary analysis. I think I'll go with Option C - keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
Yeah, Option C is probably the most efficient choice for automating the comparison in a canary deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
2 days ago
Option D does seem like it could be too much for just a canary analysis. Stick with Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Enola
5 days ago
I agree, Option C is the way to go. Keeping it simple is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Felicitas
2 months ago
I agree with Aleisha. Option C is the way to go. Comparing the canary with a new deployment of the production version wouldn't give us a fair comparison.
upvoted 0 times
Veronika
7 days ago
I've had success with configuring canary analysis this way before. It's a reliable method for ensuring smooth deployments.
upvoted 0 times
...
Silva
26 days ago
Automating the comparison will save us a lot of time and ensure we catch any issues before they affect our users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ahmed
1 months ago
Option C is definitely the best choice. We need to compare the canary with the current production version for accurate results.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aleisha
2 months ago
Option C seems to be the correct answer. Comparing the canary with the existing deployment of the current production version makes the most sense, as we want to analyze the performance difference between the new canary and the current production version.
upvoted 0 times
Candida
1 months ago
Definitely, we need to ensure the canary deployment is an improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brendan
1 months ago
It's crucial to analyze the performance difference accurately.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
2 months ago
I agree, comparing with the existing production version is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlie
2 months ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Darci
2 months ago
I agree with Sommer, comparing the canary with a new deployment of the current production version makes more sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Luz
3 months ago
I disagree, I believe we should compare the canary with the average performance of a sliding window of previous production versions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sommer
3 months ago
I think we should compare the canary with a new deployment of the current production version.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77