Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Developer Topic 6 Question 103 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Developer exam
Question #: 103
Topic #: 6
[All Professional Cloud Developer Questions]

You work on an application that relies on Cloud Spanner as its main datastore. New application features have occasionally caused performance regressions. You want to prevent performance issues by running an automated performance test with Cloud Build for each commit made. If multiple commits are made at the same time, the tests might run concurrently. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ivan
2 days ago
Why not just use a single project and instance, and reset the data state after each test? Option C sounds like the most efficient and cost-effective approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earleen
16 days ago
Creating a new project for every build is a bit overkill, in my opinion. Option A might work, but it could get expensive with all the project creation and deletion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mel
22 days ago
I'm not sure, I think option D could also work well. What do you think?
upvoted 0 times
...
Janine
22 days ago
I like the idea of using the Cloud Spanner emulator locally, as it avoids the overhead of provisioning and deleting instances. Option D could be a good choice if the emulator accurately represents the production environment.
upvoted 0 times
Brittani
6 days ago
Option D sounds like a good idea. It would definitely save time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emmett
24 days ago
Option C seems the most practical. Restoring the data state after each test run is key to ensuring reliable and consistent performance results.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
26 days ago
I agree with Talia. Option C seems like the most efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
29 days ago
I think option C is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
1 months ago
I think option A is the safest choice to avoid integration issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melvin
1 months ago
Option B? Really? That's just asking for trouble. I'd go with Option C to keep everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
Marya
12 days ago
I'd go with Option C to keep everyone on the same page.
upvoted 0 times
...
Asha
15 days ago
Option B? Really? That's just asking for trouble.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carmen
1 months ago
I prefer option C, it allows for daily integration into the main branch.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77