Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Database Engineer Topic 12 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Database Engineer exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 12
[All Professional Cloud Database Engineer Questions]

You recently launched a new product to the US market. You currently have two Bigtable clusters in one US region to serve all the traffic. Your marketing team is planning an immediate expansion to APAC. You need to roll out the regional expansion while implementing high availability according to Google-recommended practices. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ozell
1 months ago
Ah, the classic 'high availability' question. Gotta love it. I think option B is the safest bet, but if I'm feeling adventurous, maybe I'll go with C and see what happens.
upvoted 0 times
Dylan
3 days ago
Yeah, option B seems like the best option for maintaining high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Timothy
8 days ago
I would go with option B for a safer approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabel
15 days ago
I think option C could be interesting to try out, but it might be riskier.
upvoted 0 times
...
Teddy
19 days ago
I agree, option B seems like the most reliable choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Raymon
2 months ago
Haha, 'Bigtable clusters' - sounds like a supersized version of our regular database! I'm leaning towards option D, just to keep things interesting.
upvoted 0 times
Helene
11 days ago
Let's go with option D then, it seems like the best fit for our expansion to APAC.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
12 days ago
Yeah, maintaining a target of 35% CPU utilization with those cluster locations makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nadine
2 months ago
I agree, option D seems like a solid plan for the regional expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
2 months ago
Option D does sound interesting! I think it's a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louvenia
2 months ago
Wait, we need to maintain a target of 23% CPU utilization? That's a pretty low bar. I'd go with option C and spread the clusters across multiple regions to improve availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alberta
2 months ago
I'm not sure, option C also looks promising with the 35% CPU utilization target.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
2 months ago
Hmm, this looks like a tricky one. I'm thinking option B might be the way to go, keeping the clusters in the same US region for now and then adding a third cluster in APAC later.
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
25 days ago
I think we should consider the long-term scalability and performance benefits of option C for our regional expansion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tomoko
1 months ago
That's true, option C could provide better performance with the higher CPU utilization target and spreading the clusters across different regions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daron
1 months ago
But what about option C? It suggests maintaining a higher CPU utilization target and adding a cluster in APAC as well.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristin
2 months ago
I agree, option B seems like a good choice to maintain CPU utilization and keep the clusters in the same US region.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kizzy
2 months ago
I agree with Ollie, option B seems like the best choice for high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ollie
2 months ago
I think we should go with option B.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77