Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Architect Topic 4 Question 93 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 93
Topic #: 4
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

For this question, refer to the Dress4Win case study.

Dress4Win has asked you to recommend machine types they should deploy their application servers to. How should you proceed?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Herman
1 months ago
Hmm, the Dress4Win case study, you say? I bet they could use some 'Dress4Success' machine types. Get it? Dress4Win? Dress4Success? I'll see myself out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leslie
1 months ago
Option A - the ol' 'lift and shift' approach. Can't go wrong with that, right? It's the cloud equivalent of 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yolando
1 months ago
Option B is intriguing, but I'm not sure the highest RAM to CPU ratio is always the best choice. Gotta consider the application's specific needs.
upvoted 0 times
Han
6 days ago
C) Recommend that Dress4Win deploy into production with the smallest instances available, monitor them over time, and scale the machine type up until the desired performance is reached.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lai
14 days ago
A) Perform a mapping of the on-premises physical hardware cores and RAM to the nearest machine types in the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alaine
1 months ago
Option C is interesting - starting small and then scaling up as needed. I like the idea of monitoring the performance before making changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bok
2 months ago
I'm thinking Option D is the way to go. Identifying the specific resource requirements and then scaling up as needed is a more thoughtful approach.
upvoted 0 times
Caitlin
1 days ago
User 1: I agree, Option D seems like a strategic way to ensure optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valentin
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most straightforward approach. Mapping the on-premises hardware to the cloud instances makes a lot of sense to me.
upvoted 0 times
Dylan
1 months ago
User 3: Agreed. It's important to ensure we have the right resources in the cloud for optimal performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cathrine
1 months ago
User 2: That sounds like a good plan. It will help us choose the right machine types for our application servers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theron
1 months ago
User 1: I think we should perform a mapping of the on-premises hardware to the cloud instances.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Antonio
2 months ago
That's a valid point, but I still think starting with the smallest instances and scaling up gradually, as mentioned in option C, could be a more cost-effective strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rolande
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the best approach as it allows for customization based on the application server's requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Antonio
3 months ago
I think option A makes sense because it ensures a smooth transition from on-premises to the cloud.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77