Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Google Exam Professional Cloud Architect Topic 2 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Professional Cloud Architect exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 2
[All Professional Cloud Architect Questions]

For this question, refer to the EHR Healthcare case study. You need to define the technical architecture for hybrid connectivity between EHR's on-premises systems and Google Cloud. You want to follow Google's recommended practices for production-level applications. Considering the EHR Healthcare business and technical requirements, what should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

When an application becomes slow, the first step you should take is to gather information about the underlying cause of the problem. One way to do this is by inspecting the logs and metrics from the instances where the application is deployed. Google Cloud Platform (GCP) provides tools such as Cloud Logging and Cloud Monitoring that can help you to collect and analyze this information. By reviewing the logs and metrics from the instances, you may be able to identify issues such as resource shortages (e.g. CPU, memory, or disk), network problems, or application errors that are causing the performance issues. Once you have identified the underlying cause of the problem, you can take steps to resolve it.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Jina
1 months ago
Wait, was that a trick question? I feel like I'm missing something obvious here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
2 months ago
Option B seems a bit outdated, but I could be wrong. Time to brush up on my Google Cloud knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
20 days ago
Let's make sure to consider the EHR Healthcare business and technical requirements when making our decision.
upvoted 0 times
...
Van
1 months ago
I agree, having two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones provides redundancy and high availability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alyce
1 months ago
I think option A is the best choice. It follows Google's recommended practices for production-level applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nell
2 months ago
Haha, these options are like a maze! I'll have to channel my inner network architect to figure this one out.
upvoted 0 times
Maurine
10 days ago
Yeah, these options definitely require some technical expertise to navigate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ulysses
16 days ago
I think Option D might be overkill for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
19 days ago
Option A sounds like a solid plan for redundancy.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alyce
2 months ago
Option C seems the most straightforward, but I'm not sure if it meets the business requirements. Guess I'll have to dig deeper into the case study.
upvoted 0 times
Lindy
1 months ago
I think option D might be a better fit for the business requirements. It provides redundancy across different metros.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chauncey
1 months ago
C) Configure Direct Peering between EHR Healthcare and Google Cloud, and make sure you are peering at least two Google locations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynsey
2 months ago
B) Configure two VPN connections from on-premises to Google Cloud, and make sure the VPN devices on-premises are in separate racks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gwen
2 months ago
A) Configure two Partner Interconnect connections in one metro (City), and make sure the Interconnect connections are placed in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Terry
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective and meets Google's recommended practices for production-level applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sharee
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is better as it offers even more redundancy with four Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terry
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it provides redundancy with two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
That's a good point, but I still think option A is more cost-effective and meets the requirements of the case study.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenneth
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the better choice as it provides even more redundancy with four Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reena
2 months ago
Hmm, this one looks tricky. I'm leaning towards Option D, but I'll have to double-check the Google recommendations to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
Craig
1 months ago
You're right, let's double-check to ensure we're on the right track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Iluminada
1 months ago
But what about the Google recommendations? We should make sure we're following their best practices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linn
2 months ago
I agree, having multiple Dedicated Interconnect connections in different metros seems like a solid plan.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
I think Option D sounds like a good choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jesusa
2 months ago
I think option A is the best choice because it provides redundancy by having two Partner Interconnect connections in different metro zones.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77