Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Google Exam Google Workspace Administrator Topic 5 Question 26 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Google Workspace Administrator exam
Question #: 26
Topic #: 5
[All Google Workspace Administrator Questions]

A company wants to distribute iOS devices to only the employees in the Sales OU. They want to be able to do the following on these devices:

Control password policies.

Make corporate apps available to the users.

Remotely wipe the device if it's lost or compromised

What two steps are required before configuring the device policies? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

by Blair at Feb 09, 2024, 05:23 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Google Workspace Administrator Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Delsie
11 months ago
Maybe having a combination of both options A and D could work. That way, we cover all bases for a smoother experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
11 months ago
But wouldn't defining room resources be more appropriate? Option A seems more logical to me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thersa
11 months ago
I personally prefer option D. Defining users' work locations by setting building details seems like a more organized approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B is more efficient. Organizing users into Google Groups would make it easier to manage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Erinn
12 months ago
I think option A is the best way to go. It makes sense to organize users by location and add room resources accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annice
1 years ago
You know, I was also leaning towards option A. It just seems the most straightforward way to achieve the desired result. Plus, it gives you that extra layer of organization and control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
1 years ago
Yeah, I'm thinking option A might be the way to go. Organizing users by location in separate OUs and adding the room resources to the corresponding OUs seems like a clean and efficient solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twana
1 years ago
Haha, you know what they say – location, location, location! Gotta make sure those meeting rooms are right where the users need them.
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
1 years ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our understanding of room resource management in Google Workspace. The key is to make the booking process as convenient as possible for the users while ensuring they only see rooms near their location.
upvoted 0 times
Anisha
1 years ago
B) Organize users for each location in separate Google Groups. Add room resources to the corresponding groups so that meeting rooms would be suggested accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Talia
1 years ago
A) Organize users for each location in separate organizational units (OUs). Add room resources to the corresponding OUs so that meeting rooms would be suggested accordingly.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77