Google Exam Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Topic 1 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Google's Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator exam

Question #: 3
Topic #: 1

[All Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Questions]

[Chrome Extensions]

Company A uses an extension that is critical to business operations The company currently pins the version of the extension They received an updated version of the extension that delivers new functionality The Chrome administrator notices that the new version now requests all available permissions, while the previous version only requested four permissions

Which action should the Chrome administrator recommend to address this security issue?

AUse the extension's blocked hosts list to block access to risky websites

BBlock the extension until a new version is available that requires fewer permissions

CCustomize permissions for the extension to match the permissions of the previous version

DContinue using version pinning until the company contacts the developer for more information on the code change

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: B

by Man at May 02, 2025, 02:24 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium Chrome-Enterprise-Administrator Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Veda

3 days ago

Hold up, did someone say 'risky websites'? I'm pretty sure the Chrome admin isn't moonlighting as the internet police. Let's stick to the professional options here, folks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Alonso

4 days ago

Option B? Really? Who wants to block a critical business tool? That's just asking for trouble. I'll take the version pinning, thank you very much.

upvoted 0 times

...

Genevive

8 days ago

Hmm, I'm not sure I'd want to block the extension entirely. That could really mess things up. Option D seems like the most prudent choice here.

upvoted 0 times

...

Michal

9 days ago

I think we should continue using version pinning until we can get more information from the developer. We need to know why the permissions changed.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cyril

12 days ago

I think we should customize the permissions to match the previous version. It might be a hassle, but it's worth it for security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katheryn

1 months ago

I agree with Micheline. It's better to be safe than sorry when it comes to security.

upvoted 0 times

...

Micheline

1 months ago

I think we should block the extension until a new version with fewer permissions is available.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shenika

1 months ago

Personally, I'd go with option C. Customizing the permissions to match the previous version seems like the smartest move. Keeps things secure without disrupting business operations.

upvoted 0 times

...

Josphine

1 months ago

Option D is the way to go. Staying with the previous version until you get more information from the developer is the safest bet. No need to take unnecessary risks here.

upvoted 0 times

Nu

24 hours ago

User 3: I think it's better to be cautious and wait for more information before updating.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jutta

3 days ago

User 2: Yeah, we shouldn't risk using the new version without knowing more about the changes.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tyra

14 days ago

User 1: I agree, sticking with the old version seems like the safest option.

upvoted 0 times

...