GIAC Exam GCCC Topic 1 Question 57 Discussion

Actual exam question for GIAC's GCCC exam

Question #: 57
Topic #: 1

[All GCCC Questions]

Executive management approved the storage of sensitive data on smartphones and tablets as long as they were encrypted. Later a vulnerability was announced at an information security conference that allowed attackers to bypass the device's authentication process, making the data accessible. The smartphone manufacturer said it would take six months for the vulnerability to be fixed and distributed through the cellular carriers. Four months after the vulnerability was announced, an employee lost his tablet and the sensitive information became public.

What was the failure that led to the information being lost?

AThere was no risk acceptance review after the risk changed

BThe employees failed to maintain their devices at the most current software version

CVulnerability scans were not done to identify the devices that we at risk

DManagement had not insured against the possibility of the information being lost

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Miriam at Sep 14, 2024, 09:22 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium GCCC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Claudia

2 days ago

D? Really? I mean, insuring against lost data is a good idea, but it doesn't solve the root cause here. They needed to have a proper risk management process in place.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ranee

3 days ago

I'm going with C. They should have done vulnerability scans to identify which devices were at risk and prioritize patching them. Letting the vulnerability linger for 4 months is just unacceptable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jean

14 days ago

But shouldn't management have insured against the possibility of the information being lost? That could have prevented this situation too.

upvoted 0 times

...

Becky

17 days ago

I think A is the right answer here. The organization should have reviewed the risk after that vulnerability was announced and made a decision to accept or mitigate it. Relying on the manufacturer's timeline was a major oversight.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elin

18 days ago

Come on, the answer is clearly B. The employees should have kept their devices updated, that's just basic security hygiene. I can't believe they let this happen!

upvoted 0 times

...

Claudia

18 days ago

I agree with Dalene. If they had updated their devices, maybe the vulnerability could have been fixed before the information was lost.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dalene

24 days ago

I think the failure was that employees failed to maintain their devices at the most current software version.

upvoted 0 times

...