Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

GAQM Exam ISO-IEC-LI Topic 2 Question 95 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's ISO-IEC-LI exam
Question #: 95
Topic #: 2
[All ISO-IEC-LI Questions]

Responsibilities for information security in projects should be defined and allocated to:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shanice
2 months ago
I'm going with B, but I'd also like to suggest hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' just for fun.
upvoted 0 times
Frederica
13 days ago
Definitely, we should prioritize defining and allocating responsibilities for information security in projects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nada
19 days ago
Hiring a security consultant named 'Agent 007' sounds interesting, but I think sticking to the allocated responsibilities is more important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eveline
27 days ago
User 2: That's true, but hiring 'Agent 007' sounds like a fun idea!
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
27 days ago
I agree, having specified roles defined in the organization's project management method is crucial for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jesusita
1 months ago
User 1: I think B is the best option, it's important to follow the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nobuko
1 months ago
I think B is the best option, it aligns with the project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashley
2 months ago
B is the only option that makes sense. Who else would know the security requirements better than the project management team?
upvoted 0 times
...
Arthur
2 months ago
C is the way to go! The InfoSec officer is like the security wizard - they'll make sure everything is locked down tight.
upvoted 0 times
Troy
16 days ago
D) the owner of the involved asset
upvoted 0 times
...
Juan
30 days ago
C) the InfoSec officer
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
1 months ago
B) specified roles defined in the used project management method of the organization
upvoted 0 times
...
Curt
2 months ago
A) the project manager
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
2 months ago
I'm torn between B and D. Shouldn't the project manager and asset owner work together on this?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alana
2 months ago
I think the InfoSec officer should also play a role in defining and allocating responsibilities for information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Myrtie
2 months ago
I'm voting for D. The asset owner knows their stuff best, so they should be in charge of security for that asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cammy
2 months ago
Definitely B. The project management method is the way to go - it's like a roadmap for security responsibilities!
upvoted 0 times
Twana
2 months ago
The InfoSec officer should definitely be involved in defining and allocating security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
2 months ago
I think the project manager should also play a role in ensuring information security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fabiola
2 months ago
I agree, the project management method is crucial for defining security responsibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Julianna
3 months ago
I believe it should be specified roles defined in the organization's project management method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melissa
3 months ago
I agree with Kallie, the project manager is ultimately responsible for the project's success.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kallie
3 months ago
I think responsibilities should be defined by the project manager.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77