GAQM Exam CBAF-001 Topic 2 Question 41 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's CBAF-001 exam

Question #: 41
Topic #: 2

A business analyst has identified that one of the use cases on a use case diagram contains a large amount of optional processing. This optional processing is so large that he has decided to remove it to a separate use case which can be called by the original use case if required. How should the original use case be linked to the new use case?

ABy a broken, arrowed line stereotypedwith the word include.

BBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word uses.

CBy a solid line with no arrowhead or stereotype.

DBy a broken, arrowed line stereotyped with the word extend.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: A

by Lai at Mar 08, 2024, 11:32 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CBAF-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Angelyn

1 months ago

Wait, is this a trick question? I thought the extend stereotype was only for extending the functionality of a use case, not for removing optional processing. I'm going to have to think about this one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hester

2 months ago

Haha, this is a tricky one! I bet the exam writers are trying to trip us up. I'm going with option D, just to be safe.

upvoted 0 times

Alaine

6 days ago

I agree with you, option D seems like the safest bet.

upvoted 0 times

...

Terrilyn

8 days ago

I'm going with option C, it seems like the most logical choice.

upvoted 0 times

...

Zona

1 months ago

I think option A is the correct one.

upvoted 0 times

...

Katie

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure about that. Doesn't the include stereotype make more sense since the original use case is including the optional processing in the new use case?

upvoted 0 times