Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

GAQM Exam APM-001 Topic 1 Question 60 Discussion

Actual exam question for GAQM's APM-001 exam
Question #: 60
Topic #: 1
[All APM-001 Questions]

A risk response strategy in which the project team shifts the impact of a threat, together with ownership of the response, to a third party is called:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

by Noemi at Sep 17, 2024, 08:18 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium APM-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Evangelina
1 months ago
B) accept? Really? What kind of project manager just accepts a risk? That's like waving the white flag and saying, 'Bring it on, universe!' Not for me, thanks. I'll take C) transfer any day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nelida
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question: do I want to face the risk head-on or hide behind a third party? C) transfer is the way to go, my friends. That's how the big shots do it, so it must be the right answer!
upvoted 0 times
Rolf
22 hours ago
That's a good point, we should always have a backup plan in case the transfer doesn't work out.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amie
8 days ago
But what if the third party fails to handle the risk effectively?
upvoted 0 times
...
An
14 days ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Melissia
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid.
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between A) mitigate and C) transfer. On one hand, trying to minimize the risk sounds smart, but on the other hand, shifting the problem to someone else is just so much easier. Decisions, decisions...
upvoted 0 times
Vivienne
11 days ago
True, but transferring the risk can also save us time and resources.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
12 days ago
But what about mitigating the risk ourselves? It might be more proactive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
19 days ago
I agree, transferring the risk to a third party can be a smart move.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
1 months ago
I think C) transfer is the way to go. Let someone else deal with the risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
1 months ago
Yeah, it can definitely make things easier for the project team.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isadora
1 months ago
I think transferring the risk to a third party is a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashton
2 months ago
I agree with Dulce, transferring the risk to a third party is a good strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
C) transfer seems like the obvious choice here. I mean, why deal with the risk yourself when you can just pass it on to someone else, right? Talk about a win-win situation!
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it could also be D) avoid. Avoiding the risk altogether seems like a valid option too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherman
2 months ago
I agree with Truman, transferring the risk to a third party is a common strategy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Truman
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) transfer.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77