Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FWB-6.4 Topic 1 Question 24 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FWB-6.4 exam
Question #: 24
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions]

An e-commerce web app is used by small businesses. Clients often access it from offices behind a router, where clients are on an IPv4 private network LAN. You need to protect the web application from denial of service attacks that use request floods.

What FortiWeb feature should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Marjory
24 days ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about option B. Using the 'X-Forwarded-For' header to find the client's private IP might work, but it could be easily spoofed, making it less reliable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kattie
25 days ago
I'm thinking option A might be the right answer. Enabling 'Shared IP' and configuring separate rate limits for requests from NATted IPs sounds like a good approach to mitigate the DoS attack.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dick
26 days ago
Yeah, I agree. Since the clients are behind a router on a private network, the public IP addresses they're using could be shared among multiple users. We need a way to handle that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lore
27 days ago
Hmm, this question seems to be testing our knowledge of FortiWeb features for protecting against DoS attacks. I'm guessing the answer has something to do with managing requests from NATted IP addresses.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77