Haha, I bet the real-time protection is set to update the signature database from FortiSandbox. That's just classic FortiNet, always trying to push their other products.
I don't know, I feel like option B might be the correct answer here. Sending malicious files to FortiSandbox for analysis seems like a reasonable default behavior for real-time protection.
Well, let's think this through. Since it's a Windows Server, I'm guessing the real-time protection is probably disabled by default, right? That seems like the most logical option.
Hmm, this is an interesting one. Honestly, I'm not too sure about the default behavior of real-time protection when FortiClient is installed on a Windows Server. I'd have to do some research to figure that out.
Amina
24 days agoGladys
25 days agoTamala
26 days agoLizette
27 days agoBette
9 days agoKaty
10 days agoHarris
11 days agoDomonique
12 days ago