Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE8_812 Topic 1 Question 23 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE8_812 exam
Question #: 23
Topic #: 1
[All NSE8_812 Questions]

SD-WAN is configured on a FortiGate. You notice that when one of the internet links has high latency the time to resolve names using DNS from FortiGate is very high.

You must ensure that the FortiGate DNS resolution times are as low as possible with the least amount of work.

What should you configure?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sabina
27 days ago
Ah, the joys of SD-WAN and DNS. Reminds me of the time I tried to set up a DNS server on a potato. Didn't end well, let me tell you.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ozell
28 days ago
Option A is really going the extra mile. Configuring a loopback interface just for DNS? That's some next-level stuff right there.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gladys
29 days ago
Haha, I bet the guy who wrote this question is a total DNS geek. Option B looks good to me, keep it simple!
upvoted 0 times
...
Winfred
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards Option C. Using the DNS servers recommended by the providers might be a more robust solution.
upvoted 0 times
User2: I agree with User1. Option A sounds like it would help improve the FortiGate DNS resolution times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carry
13 days ago
User1: I think Option A might be the best choice. Configuring local out traffic to use the outgoing interface based on SD-WAN rules seems like a good idea.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alfred
2 months ago
Option D seems like the way to go. Directly configuring the SD-WAN rule to the DNS server should help minimize the latency.
upvoted 0 times
Arlen
17 days ago
A) Yes, it should prioritize the traffic to the DNS server and reduce latency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
18 days ago
B) That sounds like a good solution. It should help improve the DNS resolution times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hector
1 months ago
A) Configure local out traffic to use the outgoing interface based on SD-WAN rules with the interface IP and configure an SD-WAN rule to the DNS server.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Marsha
2 months ago
Hmm, that's a valid point. Maybe we should consider both options and see which one works best in our specific scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option D is the better choice. It simplifies the configuration and still achieves the desired outcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
3 months ago
I think we should go with option A. It seems like the most efficient way to ensure low DNS resolution times.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77