Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_ZTA-7.2 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 5
[All NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Questions]

An administrator wants to prevent direct host-to-host communication at layer 2 and use only FortiGate to inspect all the VLAN traffic What three things must the administrator configure on FortiGate to allow traffic between the hosts? (Choose three.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the scenario where FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM (Mobile Device Management) compliance failure and FortiClient EMS (Endpoint Management System) is integrated as an MDM connector, the typical response when an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS is to isolate the host in the registration VLAN. This action is consistent with FortiNAC's approach to network access control, focusing on ensuring network security and compliance. By moving the non-compliant or quarantined host to a registration VLAN, FortiNAC effectively segregates it from the rest of the network, mitigating potential risks while allowing for further investigation or remediation steps. Reference: FortiNAC documentation, MDM Compliance and Response Actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Herschel
1 months ago
I bet the admin is just trying to justify their FortiGate purchase. 'Oh, you need this expensive firewall to make your network work. Trust me, it's worth it!'
upvoted 0 times
Kerry
12 days ago
A) Configure proxy ARP to allow traffic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kenneth
1 months ago
Okay, let's see here. Definitely C and E, and I guess A if the admin wants to make things extra complicated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marylyn
1 months ago
Ha! Blocking intra-VLAN traffic? That's like trying to stop water from flowing downstream. Gotta go with C, E, and A to make this work.
upvoted 0 times
Earlean
13 days ago
C) Add the VLAN interface to a software switch
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lavonna
2 months ago
Hmm, blocking intra-VLAN traffic seems counterintuitive. I think the answer is C, E, and maybe D to make sure the subnets can communicate.
upvoted 0 times
Jarvis
12 days ago
Configuring a firewall policy to allow the desired traffic between hosts is also crucial.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronny
22 days ago
Yes, that will help ensure all traffic goes through the FortiGate for inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Huey
1 months ago
I agree, adding the VLAN interface to a software switch is important.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salena
2 months ago
Ah, this is a tricky one! The key is to set up the FortiGate to inspect the VLAN traffic, so I'd go with options C, E, and possibly A.
upvoted 0 times
Lisbeth
13 days ago
Option A might be helpful to configure proxy ARP for allowing traffic between hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Santos
16 days ago
I agree, those two options are crucial. I'm not sure about option A though.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
28 days ago
Yes, that will help with the VLAN traffic inspection. I also believe option E is necessary to configure a firewall policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
2 months ago
I think option C is definitely needed to add the VLAN interface to a software switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Fairy
2 months ago
I think we should configure static routes to allow subnets as well. That way, all traffic will go through FortiGate for inspection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fairy
2 months ago
I agree with Danilo. We also need to add the VLAN interface to a software switch.
upvoted 0 times
...
Danilo
3 months ago
I think we need to configure a firewall policy to allow traffic between hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77