Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Topic 1 Question 13 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_ZTA-7.2 exam
Question #: 13
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_ZTA-7.2 Questions]

Which statement is true regarding a FortiClient quarantine using FortiAnalyzer playbooks?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

In the scenario where FortiNAC has alarm mappings configured for MDM (Mobile Device Management) compliance failure and FortiClient EMS (Endpoint Management System) is integrated as an MDM connector, the typical response when an endpoint is quarantined by FortiClient EMS is to isolate the host in the registration VLAN. This action is consistent with FortiNAC's approach to network access control, focusing on ensuring network security and compliance. By moving the non-compliant or quarantined host to a registration VLAN, FortiNAC effectively segregates it from the rest of the network, mitigating potential risks while allowing for further investigation or remediation steps. Reference: FortiNAC documentation, MDM Compliance and Response Actions.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Pansy
1 months ago
FortiClient quarantine? Sounds like a party I'm not invited to. Maybe I'll just stay home and watch the FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
Ettie
7 days ago
So, FortiClient EMS takes action to quarantine the endpoint based on the information from FortiAnalyzer and FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Benton
8 days ago
Yeah, that's right. FortiGate then sends a notification to FortiClient EMS to quarantine the endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
24 days ago
I heard FortiAnalyzer discovers malicious activity in the logs and notifies FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Barrett
2 months ago
A, B, and D all sound like they could be true in some scenario, but C is the only one that directly addresses the FortiAnalyzer playbook functionality. I'm going with C.
upvoted 0 times
Marcos
5 days ago
I agree, C is the best choice for this scenario. It's all about the API communication between FortiAnalyzer and FortiClient EMS.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristina
14 days ago
Yeah, C seems to be the most direct option for a FortiClient quarantine using FortiAnalyzer playbooks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ivette
1 months ago
I think C is the correct answer because it involves FortiClient EMS quarantine through FortiAnalyzer playbook.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lashon
2 months ago
FortiClient sending logs to FortiAnalyzer? That's like asking a cat to do your taxes. Option D is clearly a red herring.
upvoted 0 times
Paris
4 days ago
C) FortiAnalyzer sends an API to FortiClient EMS to quarantine the endpoint
upvoted 0 times
...
Buddy
11 days ago
B) FortiAnalyzer discovers malicious activity in the logs and notifies FortiGate
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
1 months ago
A) FortiGate sends a notification to FortiClient EMS to quarantine the endpoint
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johnathon
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the details, but I know FortiAnalyzer plays a key role in the quarantine process. Option B seems like it could be right, but I'll have to double-check the documentation.
upvoted 0 times
Lewis
27 days ago
I agree, FortiAnalyzer definitely plays a key role in the quarantine process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Abraham
1 months ago
I think option B is correct, FortiAnalyzer discovers malicious activity in the logs and notifies FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leatha
2 months ago
Option C is the correct answer. FortiAnalyzer can integrate with FortiClient EMS to quarantine endpoints directly, without involving the FortiGate.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lauran
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think FortiGate sends a notification to FortiClient EMS to quarantine the endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
2 months ago
I agree with Avery, because FortiAnalyzer is responsible for analyzing the logs and taking action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Avery
3 months ago
I think the correct answer is C) FortiAnalyzer sends an API to FortiClient EMS to quarantine the endpoint.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77