Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_SDW-7.2 Topic 4 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_SDW-7.2 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 4
[All NSE7_SDW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibits.

Exhibit A shows the SD-WAN rule status and the learned BGP routes with community 65000:10.

Exhibit B shows the SD-WAN rule configuration, the BGP neighbor configuration, and the route map configuration.

The administrator wants to steer corporate traffic using routes tags in the SD-WAN rule ID 1.

However, the administrator observes that the corporate traffic does not match the SD-WAN rule ID 1.

Based on the exhibits, which configuration change is required to fix issue?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Kassandra
11 days ago
Wait, wait, wait... Did anyone else notice that the route map is named 'dc1-lan-rm'? That's like naming your dog 'Rover' - it's just too obvious!
upvoted 0 times
...
Malcolm
16 days ago
Unset the match-community in the route map? That's an interesting idea, but I'm not sure if that would fix the issue. Maybe we should apply the route map in the outbound direction instead.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonja
17 days ago
Haha, you've got a point there! Maybe the administrator should consider a more creative name for the route map. How about 'corporate-traffic-steering'? That sounds much more impressive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
24 days ago
The route map configuration seems to be the culprit here. We need to set the route tag to 10 in the dc1-lan-rm route map to steer the corporate traffic.
upvoted 0 times
Malcom
5 days ago
Yes, that should help steer the corporate traffic correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
15 days ago
A) In the dc1-lan-rm route map configuration, set set-route-tag to 10.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kerry
1 months ago
But changing the destination to use ISDB entries might also work, so B could be the answer too.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tran
1 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerry
2 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a