Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_PBC-7.2 Topic 2 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_PBC-7.2 exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 2
[All NSE7_PBC-7.2 Questions]

You have created a TGW route table to route traffic from your spoke VPC to the security VPC where two FortiGate devices are inspecting traffic. Your spoke VPC CIDR block is already propagated to the Transit Gateway (TGW) route table.

Which type of attachment should you use to advertise routes through BGP from the spoke VPC to the security VPC?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A, B, C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ma
28 days ago
Haha, this question is like a brain teaser. But I'm confident the answer is B) VPC attachment. Gotta love those AWS networking puzzles!
upvoted 0 times
...
Luis
1 months ago
Definitely B) VPC attachment. Anything else would be like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole, if you ask me.
upvoted 0 times
Pilar
3 days ago
Yeah, using anything else would just complicate things.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashton
4 days ago
I agree, B) VPC attachment is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kristal
1 months ago
I'm going with B) VPC attachment. It just makes sense when you're working with a Transit Gateway, right?
upvoted 0 times
...
Celestina
1 months ago
B) VPC attachment is the way to go here. Gotta love those AWS networking terms, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Tien
1 days ago
C) Route attachment is not the correct option for advertising routes through BGP.
upvoted 0 times
...
Robt
2 days ago
A) Connect attachment wouldn't work in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laura
9 days ago
B) VPC attachment is the way to go here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dona
12 days ago
B) VPC attachment
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
17 days ago
A) Connect attachment
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carey
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think Route attachment could also work for this.
upvoted 0 times
...
Armanda
2 months ago
I agree with Aaron, VPC attachment makes the most sense in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carman
2 months ago
Hmm, this seems like a tricky one. I think the answer is B) VPC attachment, since we're trying to advertise routes from the spoke VPC to the security VPC.
upvoted 0 times
Sharmaine
19 days ago
User4: Definitely, using VPC attachment will help route traffic through the FortiGate devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiara
24 days ago
User3: I agree, VPC attachment is the way to go for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marya
2 months ago
User2: Yeah, that makes sense since we want to advertise routes between VPCs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mozell
2 months ago
User1: I think the answer is B) VPC attachment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Aaron
2 months ago
I think we should use VPC attachment for this.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77