Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_PBC-7.2 Topic 1 Question 15 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_PBC-7.2 exam
Question #: 15
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_PBC-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit

An administrator deployed an HA active-active load balance sandwich in Microsoft Azure. The setup requires configuration synchronization between devices-

What are two outcomes from the configured settings? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Confirming to delete all the resources in Terraform will have the following impact:

D) It destroys all the resources in the state file.

Terraform State File Role: The terraform.tfstate file contains a real-time mapping of the resources that Terraform manages, including their current configuration and relationships. This file tracks the actual state of resources provisioned by Terraform.

Impact of Destruction: When Terraform prompts for confirmation to destroy resources, and 'yes' is entered, Terraform reads the state file and systematically removes all the resources that are managed as part of that state. This is not limited to a specific .tfvars file, IAM user, or resource group---it is a global action that affects all resources tracked by the state file associated with the current Terraform workspace and configuration.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Zack
2 months ago
Hostname sync, really? That's just basic HA stuff. I wonder if the exam authors are trying to catch us out with some obvious answers. *chuckles*
upvoted 0 times
Melina
3 days ago
Heidy: Well, we better not overlook any details then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Apolonia
7 days ago
User 3: Maybe they want to see if we really understand the basics of HA configurations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heidy
16 days ago
User 2: I think they might be trying to test our attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ma
1 months ago
User 1: Yeah, I agree. Hostname sync seems like a given in HA setups.
upvoted 0 times
...
Goldie
1 months ago
User 2: Definitely, they might be trying to test our attention to detail.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dierdre
1 months ago
User 1: Yeah, I agree. It seems like a trick question.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gilberto
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the answers. Can you explain why A and D are the correct choices?
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
2 months ago
FGCP, huh? That's a new one to me. I wonder if it's anything like VRRP or CARP. Guess I'll have to brush up on my high availability protocols.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ressie
2 months ago
I agree with Edison. A and D make sense because automatic scaling and hostname synchronization are important in an HA setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Edison
2 months ago
I think the correct answers are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laine
2 months ago
Hmm, independent devices? That's a bit surprising for an HA setup. Hopefully the configuration sync still works as expected. *scratches head*
upvoted 0 times
Louvenia
21 days ago
User1: Hopefully the sync still works as expected, even with them being independent devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amina
22 days ago
User3: Maybe option C is also relevant, by default FortiGate uses FGCP for synchronization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
1 months ago
User2: Yeah, that is surprising for an HA setup. I wonder how the configuration synchronization works then.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tammy
1 months ago
User1: I think option B is correct, FortiGate A and FortiGate B are two independent devices.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Becky
2 months ago
Looks like an HA setup in Azure, interesting! I wonder if the FortiGate instances can really scale automatically. Guess I'll have to dig deeper into the documentation on that one.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77