Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_LED-7.0 Topic 1 Question 19 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_LED-7.0 exam
Question #: 19
Topic #: 1
[All NSE7_LED-7.0 Questions]

What is the purpose of enabling Windows Active Directory Domain Authentication on FortiAuthenticator?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, D

According to the FortiManager Administration Guide, ''Central management mode allows you to manage all FortiSwitch devices from a single interface on the FortiManager device.'' Therefore, option C is true because the exhibit shows that the FortiSwitch manager is enabled and the FortiSwitch device is managed by the FortiManager device. Option D is also true because the exhibit shows that the FortiSwitch device status is offline, which means that it is not reachable by the FortiManager device, but it is authorized, which means that it has been added to the FortiManager device. Option A is false because per-device management mode allows you to manage each FortiSwitch device individually from its own web-based manager or CLI, which is not the case in the exhibit. Option B is false because the FortiSwitch device is authorized, as explained above.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Joesph
1 months ago
Hmm, I wonder if FortiAuthenticator can also use AD credentials to authenticate users directly, instead of just looking them up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Scarlet
1 months ago
I'm going with option C. Importing users from AD makes the most sense for a FortiAuthenticator deployment.
upvoted 0 times
Winfred
2 days ago
I agree, importing users from Windows AD seems like a key feature for FortiAuthenticator.
upvoted 0 times
...
Bernadine
5 days ago
I think option A could also be a valid reason. Using Windows administrator credentials for LDAP lookup sounds important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
11 days ago
Option C is a good choice. Importing users from AD can definitely be useful for FortiAuthenticator.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carry
2 months ago
Option A sounds plausible, but I'm not sure if that's the primary purpose of enabling AD domain authentication on FortiAuthenticator.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
5 days ago
User 3: Option D seems interesting too, it mentions registering FortiAuthenticator as a trusted device for Kerberos authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
11 days ago
User 3: Option D sounds interesting, it mentions proxy authentication using Kerberos.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valentin
12 days ago
User 2: I'm not sure, maybe it also enables FortiAuthenticator to import users from Windows AD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lili
15 days ago
User 1: I think option A is correct, it allows FortiAuthenticator to use Windows admin credentials for LDAP lookup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vesta
1 months ago
User 2: I agree, but I think option C is also important as it enables importing users from Windows AD.
upvoted 0 times
...
Terina
1 months ago
User 1: I think option A is correct, it allows FortiAuthenticator to use Windows admin credentials for LDAP lookup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leoma
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the Kerberos part in option D. Doesn't FortiAuthenticator use its own authentication methods?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lamar
2 months ago
Option C seems the most logical choice here. FortiAuthenticator should be able to import users from Windows AD for authentication purposes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xuan
2 months ago
I think it could also be to register FortiAuthenticator as a Windows trusted device for Kerberos authentication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Layla
2 months ago
I believe it enables FortiAuthenticator to use Windows administrator credentials for LDAP lookup.
upvoted 0 times
...
Flo
2 months ago
I think the purpose is to import users from Windows AD.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77