Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE7_EFW-7.2 Topic 3 Question 22 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE7_EFW-7.2 exam
Question #: 22
Topic #: 3
[All NSE7_EFW-7.2 Questions]

Which configuration can be used to reduce the number of BGP sessions in on IBGP network?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

For the web filtering feature to function effectively, the FortiGate device needs to have a server configured for rating services. The rating option in the server-type setting specifies that the server is used for URL rating lookup, which is essential for web filtering. The displayed configuration does not list any FortiGuard web filtering servers, which would be necessary for web filtering. The setting set include-default-servers disable indicates that the default FortiGuard servers are not being used, and hence, a specific server for web filtering (like securewf.fortiguard.net) needs to be configured.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Lilli
1 months ago
B is the right answer, no doubt. Route-reflector-client enable is the way to go. Simple and effective, just like my favorite snack, the route-reflector-chips!
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
8 days ago
Definitely, it helps reduce the number of BGP sessions in an IBGP network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josphine
16 days ago
I agree, Route-reflector-client enable is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leanora
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure about this one. Maybe I should have studied the BGP configuration guide more closely. Wait, did someone say 'route reflector'? That sounds like a superhero name, right?
upvoted 0 times
Vanesa
7 days ago
Actually, it's A) Route-reflector-peer enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicky
8 days ago
No, I believe it's D) Route-reflector-server enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carole
2 months ago
I think the answer is B) Route-reflector-client enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Long
2 months ago
C'mon, how can anyone not know this? Of course, the answer is D. Route-reflector-server enable is the way to go for reducing IBGP sessions. Route reflectors are the key, people!
upvoted 0 times
Rolland
1 months ago
No, it's actually D. Route-reflector-server enable is the correct configuration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kristeen
1 months ago
I think the answer is B. Route-reflector-client enable.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Reed
2 months ago
I think option B is the right answer. Route-reflector-client enable helps reduce the number of IBGP sessions by allowing clients to connect to a route reflector instead of having full mesh connectivity.
upvoted 0 times
Alexis
1 months ago
This helps in reducing the complexity of IBGP network.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
2 months ago
It simplifies the network by allowing clients to connect to a route reflector.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hyun
2 months ago
Route-reflector-client enable is the configuration that reduces the number of BGP sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ming
2 months ago
I agree, option B is the correct answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Johna
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think D) Route-reflector-server enable could also be a valid option to reduce BGP sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serita
3 months ago
I agree with Jeffrey, because using route reflector clients can reduce the number of BGP sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
3 months ago
I think the answer is B) Route-reflector-client enable.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77