Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_WCS-7.0 Topic 1 Question 9 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_WCS-7.0 exam
Question #: 9
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_WCS-7.0 Questions]

Your organization is deciding between deploying FortiWeb VM or Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF.

What are two benefits of choosing FortiWeb VM? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Internet Gateway Requirement:

For an Elastic IP (EIP) to be assigned to an instance's primary ENI, the VPC must have an Internet Gateway (IGW) attached. The IGW enables the VPC to communicate with the internet, allowing the EIP to function properly (Option C).

Process of Assigning EIP:

Once the Internet Gateway is attached to the VPC, the EIP can be successfully assigned to the primary ENI of the FortiGate VM, providing it with internet access.

Other Options Analysis:

Option A is incorrect because the primary ENI is already in a public subnet.

Option B is not necessary and may not solve the issue without an attached Internet Gateway.

Option D is partially correct about the routing table but does not address the primary issue of needing an Internet Gateway.


AWS Elastic IP Documentation: Elastic IP

AWS Internet Gateway: Internet Gateway

Contribute your Thoughts:

Frederick
27 days ago
I'll take the 'pay for what you use' option and the 'advanced WAF' features. Gotta keep the bean counters happy, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Zita
1 months ago
B and D, no brainer. The FortiGuard integration is a huge plus, and advanced WAF features are always welcome.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
1 months ago
A and D, hands down. I'm all about paying for what I use, and advanced WAF functionality is a game-changer.
upvoted 0 times
Felix
4 days ago
A) Only pay for what is used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kris
7 days ago
I agree, those are definitely two strong benefits.
upvoted 0 times
...
Golda
12 days ago
D) Advanced WAF functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Frank
14 days ago
A) Only pay for what is used.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lonna
1 months ago
I'll go with B and C. Zero-day protection is a must-have these days, and FortiGuard is pretty reliable.
upvoted 0 times
Noble
11 days ago
Good choices! FortiGuard is indeed reliable for keeping WAF signatures up-to-date.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rene
17 days ago
C) Zero-day protection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
1 months ago
B) Up-to-date WAF signatures powered by FortiGuard.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
B and D seem like the obvious choices here. Who doesn't love up-to-date signatures and advanced WAF features?
upvoted 0 times
Dulce
23 days ago
Harris: Absolutely, it's important to choose the right solution for our needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
1 months ago
User 3: I think those benefits would really make a difference in protecting our organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Harris
1 months ago
User 2: Yeah, having up-to-date signatures and advanced features is crucial for security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
2 months ago
User 1: I agree, B and D are definitely important for WAF.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Portia
2 months ago
I personally prefer Fortinet Managed Rules for AWS WAF because of the zero-day protection it offers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
2 months ago
I agree with Nickole. Having up-to-date WAF signatures powered by FortiGuard is also a big benefit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nickole
2 months ago
I think choosing FortiWeb VM would be great because of the advanced WAF functionality.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77