Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FWB-6.4 Topic 8 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FWB-6.4 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 8
[All NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions]

How does your FortiWeb configuration differ if the FortiWeb is upstream of the SNAT device instead of downstream of the SNAT device?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The anti-defacement feature examines a web site's files for changes at specified time intervals. If it detects a change that could indicate a defacement attack, theFortiWebappliancecan notify you and quickly react by automatically restoring the web site contents to the previous backup.


by Florinda at Sep 15, 2024, 02:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium NSE6_FWB-6.4 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Lucina
22 days ago
I bet the exam writer had a good laugh coming up with these options. SNAT devices and FortiWeb - a recipe for confusion!
upvoted 0 times
...
Herman
24 days ago
I'm stuck between A and D. Hopefully, the exam doesn't ask me to explain the difference between 'Use' and 'Add' for the X-Forwarded-For header.
upvoted 0 times
...
Novella
25 days ago
Option C sounds too good to be true. There's always some special configuration required when dealing with SNAT devices and FortiWeb.
upvoted 0 times
Leonora
9 days ago
Option C sounds too good to be true.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Louis
1 months ago
I'm going with option D. Adding the X-Forwarded-For header is the way to go when FortiWeb is downstream of the SNAT device.
upvoted 0 times
Van
8 days ago
I think option D is the correct choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desirae
2 months ago
Definitely option A. The X-Forwarded-For header is crucial when dealing with SNAT devices upstream of FortiWeb.
upvoted 0 times
Marjory
1 months ago
I agree, it's essential to enable the 'Use' X-Forwarded-For option in this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronald
1 months ago
Option A is the correct choice. The X-Forwarded-For header is important for proper functioning.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gayla
2 months ago
Hmm, that's interesting. I wonder if there is no special configuration required in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe FortiWeb must be set for Transparent Mode in that scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gayla
2 months ago
I think if FortiWeb is upstream of the SNAT device, we must enable the ''Use'' X-Forwarded-For: option.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
a