Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Fortinet Exam NSE6_FSW-7.2 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Fortinet's NSE6_FSW-7.2 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All NSE6_FSW-7.2 Questions]

Refer to the exhibit.

The profile shown in the exhibit is assigned to a group of managed FortiSwitch ports. and these ports are connected to endpoints which are powered by PoE. Which configuration action can you perform on the LLDP profile to cause these endpoints to exchange PoE information and negotiate power with the managed

FortiSwitch?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Paulina
11 months ago
Power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs? Sounds like a no-brainer to me. D all the way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Dustin
11 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam writer had a field day coming up with these options. D is the way to go, no doubt about it.
upvoted 0 times
Filiberto
10 months ago
It's important for the endpoints to exchange PoE information and negotiate power.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stacey
10 months ago
Yeah, adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
10 months ago
I agree, D is definitely the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Whitley
10 months ago
Definitely, D seems like the most logical choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brynn
10 months ago
Yeah, I agree. Adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs is the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Meghan
10 months ago
I think D is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Sharen
11 months ago
Option B looks interesting, but I'm not sure if assigning a new LLDP profile is necessary just to handle different LLDP-MED TLVs. D seems like the most straightforward choice here.
upvoted 0 times
Linwood
11 months ago
Yeah, D seems like the most efficient choice for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashley
11 months ago
I think D is the best option too. It directly adds power management to advertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
11 months ago
Hmm, that makes sense too. It's important to advertise power management information for negotiation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Helga
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is D) Add power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janessa
12 months ago
I think the correct answer is D. Adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise seems like the logical step to enable PoE negotiation between the endpoints and the FortiSwitch.
upvoted 0 times
Marsha
11 months ago
I agree, adding power management as part of LLDP-MED TLVs to advertise makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yun
11 months ago
I think the correct answer is D.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozell
12 months ago
I think the answer is A) Create new a LLDP-MED application type to define the PoE parameters.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77